Jump to content

RoverDude

Parts Hero
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,074

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RoverDude

  1. RoverDude
    I'd also add that this particular thread is probably not the best place to be having a debate over USI-LS vs TAC-LS, and to remind folks (in general) to be cool, given all of this stuff is provided to you for free, and as noted, rumors of this mod's deprecation appear greatly exaggerated. Support the mods you like, quietly vote with your feet on the ones that do not suit your playstyle, but don't be jerky - whether that's hijacking another mod's thread to advertise other stuff, or talking trash about other mods (hint: Any sentence that starts with 'No offense...' usually means you should rethink that post...). I expect Taranis would appreciate it if folks got things back on topic
  2. RoverDude
    Especially since it's 1.08 per Kerbin day not Earth day. But 0.00005 u/s is universal.
  3. RoverDude
    Best bit for this is to only deploy two sets of landing struts.
  4. RoverDude
    There are of course several mods that change progression, but that's different than changing gameplay - which is what your idea sounds like, and could be very interesting
  5. RoverDude
    Still math
  6. RoverDude
    Yeah, just noodling to be honest.
  7. RoverDude
    Right now (and it will continue to be this way) penalties are adjustable for each category, and can vary between vets and non-vets
  8. RoverDude
    said opt-in would be TAC-LS About the only split I'd consider would be breaking apart long-term supplies (food, toothbrushes, etc.) with short-term consumables (water/oxygen), only because you can extract the latter in different ways than the former. But it's a slippery slope, depends on demand.
  9. RoverDude
    FYI - I pulled the Alpha tag given how pretty darn stable this has been While there will be some extensions added (I have a few ideas), these are going to be done in ways that are 100% opt-in and also backwards compatible - and since each layer will add both depth as well as a constraint, they will be tagged off by default. This should also make forward testing of new features a bit easier, keep everything nice and non-save breaking, and help folks test things out.
  10. RoverDude
    Thanks, easy bits to fix I need to fiddle with a release anyway as there have been a few things that have needed tweaking
  11. RoverDude
    That too As I said, those wheels are meant to power some fairly heavy loads - so if you're spinning/bucking, you need to turn some of them off (or use the lighter wheels).
  12. RoverDude
    Use the smaller ones (non-deployable, narrower). - - - Updated - - - Side note - the wheels assume you probably have a fairly heavy load on the Karibou - so if you're running unladen, expect doughnuts (and you probably want to turn off the motors on some if you don't need the extra power).
  13. RoverDude
    Grats on the release
  14. RoverDude
    Are you using the smaller wheels? Pics please
  15. RoverDude
    Ask in the CKAN thread
  16. RoverDude
    In the case of Duna, just add parachutes. Or do a vertical landing and keel it over with SAS or RCS... lots of options. I leave landing as an exercise for the user. RE packing, I suppose with enough KIS storage and some patience, but at 2.5m you'd have just as much issue (if not more) landing and assembling a KIS-packed version tbh.
  17. RoverDude
    Nice stuff Mynar!
  18. RoverDude
    heh, well I think we're in the right book but not on the same page. What I am really trying to avoid is to have people's resource chain change in OSE if they install MKS (and to be honest, a single resource path to specialized parts completely breaks MKS). i.e. right now, in the MKS adaption of OSE, it's three harvestable resources to make materialkits (and likely the same three but combined with some of the existing commodities for SpecialziedParts). Understanding that Taniwha was moving that direction as well (he mentioned things like ceramics, etc.), the idea was for us to sort out and standardize what those would be, so integration would be a lot more seamless. As it is, given it's been about a month and gentle reminders are not getting us an EL resource list, I figure the two of us can at least come up with something and get it sorted - but ultimately that's your call If a multi-resource path does not fit in with OSE, I can just move forward with something on my own, since I'll have to do that with EL anyway, until such time as Taniwha changes the EL 'hard' mode, at which point I can circle back.
  19. RoverDude
    While I am not a BDArmoury user, I still appreciate a really nice set of models when I see them Excellent work - have some rep!
  20. RoverDude
    To be even more exact, there is only one seed and that's created per - save.
  21. RoverDude
    Bear in mind though CRP is nothing more than resource definitions
  22. RoverDude
    Nice work
  23. RoverDude
    Very nice! Adding this to my save
  24. RoverDude
    No reason why not
  25. RoverDude
    Nope.
×
×
  • Create New...