Jump to content

RoverDude

Parts Hero
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,074

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RoverDude

  1. RoverDude
    Sure, happy to take patches and if the FAR/RC ones are MM I can bundle those. Very cool! Payload rack as the root part is best, then slap in the probe controller this includes. Rather than add the older inline packages back, a better question is why the radial ones are causing issues? I include these because by having the internals component based, you get to learn fun things about balance, etc. - the idea of the mod being that you get to do lots of rocketry experimentation on the cheap and in the small. - - - Updated - - - Never added one in as we already have a 0.625m stock engine
  2. RoverDude
    Yep. I have a very long list of stuff to work on
  3. RoverDude
    Awesome I figure folks would make use of that separate model
  4. RoverDude
    Should really use subluminal engines for that - the mod is optimized for lightspeed travel. Other uses void the warranty
  5. RoverDude
    Actually you can if you have the right tanks
  6. RoverDude
    Updating as updates occur - the mod works in it's current form so it requires relatively little maintenance, and I have about a dozen other mods to maintain
  7. RoverDude
    More info, like what tech tree you're using, and do you have any other tech tree mods.
  8. RoverDude
    Within two weeks. I'll be posting details in advance. It will likely be very boring.
  9. RoverDude
    Fyi, ping me with anything you need to help this work with MKS, as it's a nice extension. Also for CTT there's a colonization high end node that I had for the mks mk-IVs that this would fit well in.
  10. RoverDude
    I need to look on the FS end - tbh I rarely use the FS hover mode and just fly manually. Side note - looks like I will be doing some twitch streaming on the various USI mods pretty soon, I'll see about doing some VTOL demos as part of that.
  11. RoverDude
    Gotcha. Yeah, I would still say that ModuleAnimationGroup is the wrong place for what you want (again, separation of concerns, etc.). Why not just use the regular ModuleResourceConverter then? Input of EC, no outputs. Done.
  12. RoverDude
    Thanks for picking this up Ping me if you need anything RE USI-LS compatability
  13. RoverDude
    Easy enough to lower that then. Log a github issue please
  14. RoverDude
    There will be some welded parts to account for some of the configs that FTT needs.
  15. RoverDude
    That would really be out of scope for that module (separation of concerns and all that jazz). That being said, if you want to use it in conjunction with something more lightweight than a full on converter, just implement it using IAnimatedModule (it's super lightweight) and you're all set.
  16. RoverDude
    Heya! And yeah - with MKS disconnected bases are absolutely a thing:
  17. RoverDude
    Yep, but if you want to make sure there's a specific github issue out that makes it a bit easier for me to fix.
  18. RoverDude
    Or HyperEdit
  19. RoverDude
    Ion engines being useable as atmospheric landing engines are tho, that's the side effect.
  20. RoverDude
    Sure, if they were still a side effect. Now, they are not. Not because they were specifically targeted, just that a prior 'interesting and unintentional' side effect got corrected with the ISP changes. Use as landers should not be the driving design factor for ion engines. If players get creative, great. If for whatever reason the ability vanishes due to completely orthogonal balance updates, so be it. Not much different than people wanting infinigliders, etc.
  21. RoverDude
    No answer on the first questions - but regarding ablation and DRE, that's more a question for the DRE thread.
  22. RoverDude
    And yeah - feel free to distribute whatever - no different than there being a dozen TAC-LS greenhouses. But it would not be part of the core mod as that's kinda what MKS is for (especially with the new update).
  23. RoverDude
    Probably not as it's pretty counter to the balance of my other mods (i.e. I put cultivators higher on the tree, and the current greenhouse part is way too small to support that level of balance). (For more specificity) I don't agree with 100% self sufficiency in a package as small as a mini-greenhouse and a drill, since the drill makes the greenhouse's balance irrelevant since you now have an infinite supply of mulch. I counter this in MKS in a few ways... Decreasing efficiency over time (Machinery), heavier modules (the MKS Mk-II's have cultivators, Mk-V's do not), or (on the machinery/rocketparts side) with catalysts (so you get a mass reduction but still have a limiting factor). Now - what other folks want to do, etc. is totally up to them, but it would not make sense for me to bundle a config that's out of balance with the rest of the constellation (Trivia - the entire reason MKS exists is because I thought the contemporary greenhouse offerings for TAC-LS were too OP).
  24. RoverDude
    The mod you just described is MKS Take water/substrate, combine to make organics (which turn into supplies).
  25. RoverDude
    Will second doing this as MM. The rub is that folks copy stuff from this thread, and we end up planting the seed of future support issues
×
×
  • Create New...