[[1.1] RemoteTech v1.6.10 [2016-04-12]]

I downloaded the thing from git (as was posted on the previous page), and I could send back data on my first career mission after I had unlocked the first antenna. So the very basics seem to work fine, at least.

I think I remember reading issues with science transfer the other day. How was that? And maybe it is issues with this mod's specific antenna.

[[1.1] RemoteTech v1.6.10 [2016-04-12]]

how about answering the dam question instead of being so arrogant?

is typing the word "NO" so much harder than the word "read"

I agree. Don't turn this into the League of Legends forum.

Many times when you read back, something follows a chain of events or issues. Where a message might say that "it works in 1.0," many times, it is referring to another mod being discussed or an aspect of the mod itself working but not the entire mod.

It is often appropriate to ask this question, especially in the kind manner he did. It is never appropriate to be childish.

____

Typing "No" would've actually been two letters easier.

And your fighting stance counter remark to him only solidifies these arguments.

Please do not turn these forums into something most of us do not want.

[[1.8-1.12] TextureReplacer 4.5.3 (8.2.2022)]

Stupid question..

Does this mod also help with RAM issues? I see that it compresses but my plan would be to use it with active texture management.

Thanky

[[1.2.1] Outer Planets Mod (2.1) - Active development has moved, see first post for new thread]

WAY stoked on this mod, but only now found out about it. Problem is, I use a lot of mods...USI, KAS, etc.

Does this mod take a ton of RAM (don't want to crash if only on 32 bit) or does it only take up active memory when I'm nearish...the 2.3km distance from objects thing? (I guess that distance rule is different with planets but you know what I mean)

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Attachment System (KAS) 0.5.8]

No problem! Already got it. But its my first time using it.

Will it allow me to move items, etc., as KAS does? I doubt it since that is the core function of KAS but thought I should ask.

[[1.0.5] TAC Life Support v0.11.2.1 [12Dec]]

TaranisElsu,

I love TAC LS and have used it since I bought the game in 23.5. With the advent of stock drills, would you consider in TAC LS making a mod for the refinery so it can convert ore to water and oxygen to refill tac ls tanks if you have not already done so?

Thanks

I love the idea of more incorporation, but I think we need to stay closer to reality.

Arguably, drilling a rock/metal asteroid would use water rather than grant it. If it were a comet, that is another matter.

But perhaps you can make it possible to get water and oxygen, converted from water, from drilling in an area that has snow, for example, or using a device to extract from pools.

[[1.0.5] TAC Life Support v0.11.2.1 [12Dec]]

How is this even possible, the female use an different model but is elsewhere the same.

Real weird bug.

Probably the coding in anticipation of different applications in the future between male and female kerbals. Seems unlikely especially since I don't know what that would entail but it would explain the difficulty in cross-application.

[[1.0.5] TAC Life Support v0.11.2.1 [12Dec]]

Just wanted to add my own thanks, and I look forward to the update. It's funny, I rack up a bunch of mods to try to simplify tedious aspects of the game, but TAC-LS's added complexity makes things interesting. I appreciate what other modders are doing with their own LS mods but I'll be sticking with TAC.

Agreed. Your mod is so easy to incorporate yet remains complex. It doesn't feel right to go anywhere else. But don't get me wrong, those other modders make other good mods, too.

Thanks man!

[[1.0.5] TAC Life Support v0.11.2.1 [12Dec]]

Ok, wait- DOES it work with 1.0? Has anybody actually tested it? I know that I'm gonna sound impatient, and I'm trying not to rush, but: I really can't play without this mod! It's TOO great!

I feel ya man. I can't play without this and remotetech either. But I don't think it is worth trying the .9 version. They almost always add new code and it probably isn't worth the stress to try reloading.

He has rocked before on timing so I wouldn't worry too much.

[Simple: Adding mods to an ongoing career]

Very appreciated because these mods will modify the tree.

Thanks for the input.

[(KSP 1.10 + 1.12 ) Mission Controller 3.2.0 (Final Version) (Updated 6/25/2021)]

Much appreciated man!

[(KSP 1.10 + 1.12 ) Mission Controller 3.2.0 (Final Version) (Updated 6/25/2021)]

I understand I can just not use it but I wanted to ask...

Is there a way to disable and rid the interface of the emergency revert red button? I play with no reverting and I hate the temptation. Plus, I am always worried about mods interacting with each other or unnecessary memory usage.

Thanks for an awesome mod!

[Universal Storage 1.4.0.0 (For KSP 1.4.x) 13th March 2018]

That makes sense if core parts are played with in the mod.

Thank you again and thanks for the mod!

[Universal Storage 1.4.0.0 (For KSP 1.4.x) 13th March 2018]

Since it has to do with your mod, which I love by the way, I'd rather ask you directly...

Am I safe to play 1.0 and later install the updated US without it harming my career file?

Thanks man!

[Simple: Adding mods to an ongoing career]

Simple question...

Can you start a career and just progressively install more mods without hurting the save game. I.E. Can I start a new 1.0 and then install universal storage once it's out and continue that game without fear of harming the game?

[How to make surface connections stiffer?]

All I can suggest is struts. You are able to strut interiors of parts depending on where the mouse is so it remains hidden and that does a pretty good job. I can't think of anything else, sorry.

And to be more clear, interiors as in you place a strut invisibly inside a part and strut it to the adjacent component.

[Thrust Limits, etc., as a Stage OR actuated via toggle]

Just as the title says.

I like the idea of being able to set an engine's thrust limits in a stage.

E.g. - I have a shuttle...When the solid fuels come off, I want to reduce the thrust limit on the directly vertical thrust to favor the diagonal. So, at launch, an engine is being used at 100%, lets say. Once I engage the stage, I would love for the limit to engage as well rather than having to right click and change myself constantly, especially since there are multiple engines involved.

No, I don't want a shuttle mod. If I wanted that, I would just ask someone to come play the game for me. The fun is in it doing it yourself.

[to FAR or not to FAR]

Or practice with FAR and prep for 1.0.

Plus, the chicks totally dig a player with FAR...

Its how I got my wife (see above).

You can also consider NEAR. It is much more friendly with aircraft. FAR is pretty brutal, but I also play with deadly reentry so that may have some degree of effect. And yes, Jarmund is right on. It is absolutely worth it. Makes you play around a bit more with delta-v since it will no longer be a definite 4500 to attain orbit, dependent on drag variables, etc.

[Newbie Question about missions]

This is really simple to address. I know exactly the problem.

Lets say you want to test a specific engine at 10k altitude at 500mps.

You are using that engine to get to the desired alt/speed. Once there, all checks are full. But the problem is that you are using the engine! There are two ways around this...

1) make it multistage. Once all checks are reached, activate the stage with the fresh engine.

2) while in flight and at the desired place or immediately before reaching, open a new, empty stage below the already in use engine by clicking the "+" stage button and dragging as necessary to the bottom. Your stages will all remain the same except there will be the new blank one before the now, already active engine. Press space once you reached all parameters to "activate" that stage. It will trick the computer into thinking you are now activating that engine, even though it is already working.

"using" or "activating" the part is simply actuating its staging. This is not the same as with landing gear, where you need to right click them and "test" them.

[Planetary Scale Manipulation]

I was thinking you could incorporate planetary scaling with difficulty.

Maybe have it increase with difficulty?

Don't have it increase on its own, per game, but instead make it available as a variable when setting a custom difficulty?

I just like the idea of balancing out the massive amount of money I can still make in career mode on the hardest mode. Yes, I can reduce payout, but I feel like increased funds use (rather than reducing payout) allows for more fun. Larger rockets = greater complexity than simply taking away money, etc.

What you think? Expand...

----

I realize there are scaling mods, like 6.4, but This allows per application use. Worse case I just load that but I feel integration is a good idea.

----

[Sepratrons ONLY (for propulsion) Attain Orbit, etc.]

Fair enough. But I posted this following the spirit of other challenges. I didn't see anywhere all those details were needed. Just thought it would be fun to have people post attempts/creations for accomplishing anything past orbit with sepratrons.

While it makes sense to have rankings, etc., on other challenges, this one would be harmed completely by something like that.

I'll just request this be taken down. Kind of annoying how its been treated.

In the meantime, I will consider other challenges that fit.

[Sepratrons ONLY (for propulsion) Attain Orbit, etc.]

I have yet to see someone post an attempt.

Lets keep this a challenge and not a discussion thread.

Interesting things nonetheless. Especially my ability to read minds.

[Sepratrons ONLY (for propulsion) Attain Orbit, etc.]

at 4 minutes:

Pretty sweet. Haven't seen this.

Also, he didn't make it into orbit. And if that is not a challenge, try devising some way to orbit the Mun, land, then return to Kerbin just with sepratrons.

[Sepratrons ONLY (for propulsion) Attain Orbit, etc.]

As it says. Lets see some posts of who can make it into orbit, or do anything else more extreme, using only sepratrons.

[How to rendezvous/intercept properly?]

The biggest thing...when you are within 10km (I think), your pro/retrograde becomes relative to the target. burn retro until you are at 0 orbit, relative to the target (it will show 0 m/s) and then aim at the circlular red target, burn, burn retro as you close in...rinse - repeat.