Jump to content

Dman979

Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,106

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dman979

  1. Dman979
    I didn't think it was disruptive at all. Not considering all the points of view is bad. Also, you made your point very well, both in Bosnia and on these forums. That's always the best outcome.
  2. Dman979
    Yup. He unspoilered the last panel.
  3. Dman979
    7/10. I don't really like animated avatars, but the idea is neat. Also, this is the oldest running forum game.
  4. Dman979
    Oh yeah, big time. I got a new computer this summer, and I was really surprised that it didn't have a DVD player. In fact, none of the models I looked at had them. But I digress.
  5. Dman979
    Yeah, he looks like he's yawning.
  6. Dman979
    Put sandpaper on your wipers to clear off a frozen windshield.
  7. Dman979
    That's absolutely right. The game is supposed to be fun. There is no "bad side" and there is no "good side," just "Get to -100" and "Get to 100." Play it, and enjoy it, in a spirit of fun.
  8. Dman979
    Wait just a cotton-picking second! The title of this thread is now "Endgame Studies complete" END GAME = Ender's Game STUDIES = Ender studies fighting wars From this, we can easily see that the final battle will be controlled by Gene Kerman and Kermulan. They are both on their own own planet, just like Ender was. Ipso, facto. See what over-speculation can do? It's fun!
  9. Dman979
    No... they go retrograde. Standard orbital insertion, AFAIK- just backwards. And @quasarrgames, how did it go?
  10. Dman979
    Bulk moderation. I've never seen a contradiction in 5 words before.
  11. Dman979
    Wait, what? When did all that ^^^ happen? And Happy Thanksgiving to you, too.
  12. Dman979
    A fitting tribute. Nice work!
  13. Dman979
    Correct.
  14. Dman979
    It's a beautiful world out there. Go exploring!
  15. Dman979
    Is the last valid. And no, not quite so "cool beans." This is just a game, nothing more. There's no reason to compare it to real life.
  16. Dman979
    That is correct. @DarkOwl57's post was invalid. was valid, like I said above. This was your next post: Which was valid.
  17. Dman979
    I get confused there, too. I always end up asking Deu.
  18. Dman979
    No. In the case of two posters posting the same number with the same operation right after each other, skirmish rules apply. The second one is valid. If you get three people posting the same number with the same operation in a row, ask Deutherious.
  19. Dman979
    Errors are errors, and may be reverted to at all times stated in the rules, regardless of whether they are materialistic or not.
  20. Dman979
    @Mycroft, does that clear things up? And no, the post above me is not legal.
  21. Dman979
    Is the last valid.
  22. Dman979
    The rule was put in place because of situations like this. We would have teams of 3 or 4 people on one side, spamming merrily away, and one player on the other side. This was obviously unfair for the small side. To counter this, someone suggested allowing the players to "overwrite" the previous post, in order to keep things fair. After some trial and error, we ended up with this system. We also added the Medal of Dishonor to discourage two-person teams from running up the score. It works well, and from a GM standpoint, it allows weaker teams to remain competitive in the face of overwhelming odds.
  23. Dman979
    Probably nothing. I just got a new game recently, so I'm still enjoying it. On a related note, anyone play Squad?
  24. Dman979
    I know a foolproof way to remain undetected by radar, and it's very Kerbulan. Kill the radar.
  25. Dman979
    Madness? Try announcing the new number in a News Broadcast. You have to do the whole, "Back to you, X" thing, too. Take a look at those posts to see how we did it back in my day.
×
×
  • Create New...