Jump to content

insert_name

Members
  • Posts

    1,469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by insert_name

  1. 10 hours ago, mikegarrison said:

    Consider a spacecraft cooling system. It moves heat from inside the spacecraft to the radiators, and due to the Second Law, you end up with more heat in the radiators than you removed. Sounds like a net loss, right? Except having hot radiators is actually good, because then the heat radiates out into the rest of the universe.

    That seems to be the idea the OP is going for, except the issue is that it would be as if your radiators were covered by insulating blankets. In that case all you would be doing is getting the radiators hot to no good effect. (The atmosphere is the insulating blanket.)

    He said he wanted to heat the atmosphere and use that to cool the ground, going off the spacecraft analogy, this would be like putting the radiator inside of the spacecraft.

  2. 8 hours ago, Nuke said:

    you can see the whole thing from the city cam video. power failures, the clearing of the bridge (in the minutes before traffic was light but consistent). i bet they called it in when they first lost power, i cant imagine 911 dispatch being that fast in baltimore. wonder why the word wasn't passed to the construction crew. judging by the length of the ramps it was likely out of bullhorn range and the crew was probably operating loud machinery wearing hearing protection and not listening to the radio.

    Dispatch audio was released, they said that they were blocking traffic with two cars, working on getting a car to get the crew off the bridge when the ship hits

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6349808520112

  3. 14 minutes ago, tater said:

    Dunno about those sorts of bumper designs, but you'd think with a sharp point, the bow would then glance off—and the barrier can be at some distance. Have such barriers been built at any other port?

    There are stone barriers blocking the towers for the Veranzo narrows bridge in New York

    https://earth.google.com/web/@40.60439396,-74.05263203,-0.01732777a,228.49768441d,20.58168206y,154.92139924h,64.83115515t,-0r

  4. 2 hours ago, Minmus Taster said:
      Reveal hidden contents

    Where is the Mun or Bust CSM? - KSP1 Discussion - Kerbal Space Program  Forums

    Jeb would be proud :cool:

     

    Something that's been bugging me is why can't they just use the thrusters to push it over? It doesn't look like it's embedded too deep.

    The telemetry from the stream made it seem like all the thrusters were in a ring on the bottom facing down so it would be hard to tip it with those 

  5. 20 hours ago, SunlitZelkova said:

    It’s Rogozin, so you never know, but I am inclined to think this is either fake or AI generated.

    It’s too dumb even for Rogozin. Modern Soyuz vehicles are not equipped with guidance systems like a ballistic missile, and cruise missiles and SRBMs are already being used anyways.

    Yeah the only way I actually see this being a practical idea is if the new reentry vehicle they cobble together on top of a platform wholly unsuitable for ICBM work is somehow more reliable than whatever ballistic missiles they have lying around, maybe if the private in charge of maintenance decides to get into the scrap copper business, though I don't think a Soyuz would fare much better against that

  6. 20 hours ago, tater said:

    Large solar panels. Could stick an RTG and a high-gain to it I suppose. Dunno what the dv of it is. Doesn't need much to slingshot out of the solar system.

    yeah maybe,  but I don't think there are many missions worth using an RTG on where you would use a cheap ESPA ring bus instead of a custom design, not to mention the thermal control, micrometeoroids, radiation hardening, and the rather scarce nature of ground stations that can reach that far

×
×
  • Create New...