[[1.12.5] Restock - Revamping KSP's art (August 28)]

The parts restock-decoupler-1875-1.cfg and restock-separator-1875-1.cfg are not showing up in my game (Main Install\GameData\ReStockPlus\Parts\Coupling\1875).

EDIT:

I think I found the cause, the "TechRequired = advancedConstruction" should be changed to "TechRequired = advConstruction" 

[[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Terrain [v2.2.0] [20 March 2019]]

On 9/30/2019 at 10:14 AM, KSPNoob said:

 

I mean just disable the textures for the planets that have new textures and keep it for the ones still using the old ones.  

I also think this is a great ideia. The current version of SVT should work with KSP 1.8.1 when Kopernicus gets updated?

[[1.12.X] Feline Utility Rovers v1.3.4 (28. April 2022)]

@Nils277 have you ever considered making half tanks (in height) and some parts for unmanned rovers?

 

[[1.12.x] Near Future Technologies (September 6)]

19 minutes ago, Nertea said:

NF Spacecraft 1.2.1

Great, checking the parts now! But I actually like the tanks, I think I'll keep them active in my own install 

Edit: a small suggestion. The first bottom node in the LV-95-6 is impossible to use. Making the two nodes size "1" solves the problem.

[[WIP][1.9.x-1.12.x] Scatterer-atmospheric scattering (0.0838 - 14/08/2022) Scattering improvements, in-game atmo generation and multi-sun support]

Small bug report: opening and closing the bay doors on the Mk2 Lander Can causes the game to shutter a lot (with ReStock is even worse, maybe beause it uses higher textures). I did a clean 1.6.1 install with only to Scatterer to test, should be easy to reproduce.

[[WIP] Restock: KSP Part Art Revamp (Released March 06)]

@Nertea Thank God the Version 0.1.3 with the final small fixes came out before 1.7.0 

Do you have any more info on that 0.625m Drone Core listed in GitHub for ReStock+? That part interests me a lot.

Edit: and another question, the Oscar-A was not included on the release on purpose?

Thanks!

[[1.12.5] Restock - Revamping KSP's art (August 28)]

38 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said:

How can I use SSPXR with ReStock, and keep the ReStock models?

I thought they were the same  Anyway, the patches that do that are located in GameData\StationPartsExpansionRedux\Patches\SSPXr-StockPartReplacements.cfg

You can delete the whole file, or the lines related to the parts that you don't want changed. 

Instead of deleting you can also change the .cfg extention to something that the game doesn't read, like .txt or .cfg.prune. Or put a // in front of the lines that you want to be ignored. This way is easier to revert changes in the future. 

[[1.8.x+] Strategia [v1.8.0] [2019-10-22]]

On 1/11/2019 at 4:12 PM, _Zee said:

Edit:
Found the culprit. There is no `title` definition for the Strategia Agent.

@_ZeeCould you give a more detailed explanation on how to fix that? Thanks!

[[1.8+] Custom Barn Kit 1.1.20 (19 October 2019) - Parachute Included]

It's possible to fully disable the parachutes? I've tried putting level 6, but then they always have the parachutes.

[[1.7] CommNet Visualisation v1.0.4 [17 April 2019]]

On 3/5/2019 at 10:52 PM, DeltaDizzy said:

Im not sure if this has already been reported, but I am fairly confident that it is CommNet Visualization causing some issues with the VAB/SpaceCenter. I can go into the VAB fine at first, but once I launch a mission and return to the space center, I cannot enter any buildings except the Launchpad. (I merely tested if clicking it did anything, not if I could enter the flight scene, and I will follow this up with more thorough testing soon, as well as an install with just this.) It also occurs if I remain in the VAB too long. (I get stuck in the VAB and the Launch and Exit buttons do nothing.) Here is what the console spit put when I tried to launch a vessel withe the second variant affecting me.

[ERR 18:37:55.601] Input is null for field 'name' in config node 'SCENARIO'
   at System.Environment.get_StackTrace()
   at ConfigNode.AddValue(System.String name, System.String value)
   at ScenarioModule.Save(.ConfigNode node)
   at ProtoScenarioModule..ctor(.ScenarioModule module)
   at ScenarioRunner.UpdateModules()
   at ScenarioRunner.GetUpdatedProtoModules()
   at Game.Updated(GameScenes startSceneOverride)
   at GamePersistence.SaveGame(System.String saveFileName, System.String saveFolder, SaveMode saveMode, GameScenes startScene)
   at FlightDriver.StartWithNewLaunch(System.String fullFilePath, System.String missionFlagURL, System.String launchSiteName, .VesselCrewManifest manifest)
   at EditorLogic.<goForLaunch>m__44()
   at CallbackUtil+<DelayedCallback>c__Iterator1.MoveNext()
   at UnityEngine.SetupCoroutine.InvokeMoveNext(IEnumerator enumerator, IntPtr returnValueAddress)

[EXC 18:37:55.601] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
    ScenarioModule.Save (.ConfigNode node)
    ProtoScenarioModule..ctor (.ScenarioModule module)
    ScenarioRunner.UpdateModules ()
    ScenarioRunner.GetUpdatedProtoModules ()
    Game.Updated (GameScenes startSceneOverride)
    GamePersistence.SaveGame (System.String saveFileName, System.String saveFolder, SaveMode saveMode, GameScenes startScene)
    FlightDriver.StartWithNewLaunch (System.String fullFilePath, System.String missionFlagURL, System.String launchSiteName, .VesselCrewManifest manifest)
    EditorLogic.<goForLaunch>m__44 ()
    CallbackUtil+<DelayedCallback>c__Iterator1.MoveNext ()
    UnityEngine.SetupCoroutine.InvokeMoveNext (IEnumerator enumerator, IntPtr returnValueAddress)

By removing CommNet Visualization the bug was instantly fixed, but as I said earlier I will do much more through testing and issue isolation tomorrow and/or the next day or two.

I was having the exact same problem, with the same " Input is null for field 'name' in config node 'SCENARIO' " in the logs.

How did you suspected of this mod? I struggled with it for a long time, tested a lot of mods, without any luck. I would never suspect of this one!

Curiously, it did not occurred with only one save, which I think I created using the "CommNet Constellation", that I uninstalled afterwards. I think this mod is derived of that one, or something like that.

I did a decent amount of testing, and as soon I removed this mod the problem disappeared! Will need to play some more time to be 100% sure, but, so far, so good.

Thank you!!

@DeltaDizzy

[[Minimum KSP version 1.11] Surface Mounted Lights v1.19]

@Tonka Crash No, and I'll not. I'm talking to developer of this mod, and making a kind suggestion.

[[Minimum KSP version 1.11] Surface Mounted Lights v1.19]

@IgorZ  I really liked the feature that changes the color of the lens. Compatibility with Restock would be very appreciated! I tested and the lights don't turn on at all.

Thanks.

[[1.12.5] Restock - Revamping KSP's art (August 28)]

This is what I would call "Making History". This will be remembered by the whole community for years and years to come. You and the whole team have changed KSP forever.

Thanks! 

[[WIP] Restock: KSP Part Art Revamp (Released March 06)]

@Nertea It's easier when we don't want all the parts in a revamp, you could easily chose each ones to keep or not using Janitor's Closet, everything in-game, and with the possibility to see both parts side by side. If you don't want the stock one, you prune it and keep the other. Of course, you lose the possibility to share that craft file like it was stock - not a problem for me.

Some parts also have config names totally different from the in-game part name, like the Rhino Engine, it's called Size3AdvancedEngine. Can take some time to find a lot of parts this way. Ven's can be even worse, I remember it using other name for the same part after it was replaced (For example: VenStockRevamp/Squad/Parts/Propulsion/KR-2L for the Rhino)

I can say I really liked everything you did so far, I highly doubt I will don't want all the parts. But there's people out there with different (and questionable) tastes, like the ones that like the poo brown heat shields. Since having two distributions is out of question (and since you are keeping in mind to make something clean I don't even see the need for it anymore), here's my humble suggestion:

If it don't impact performance, make one .cfg file for each part, with names that are easily recognizable knowing the name the part have in-game, inside folders with the category names  If, for any reason, multiple parts will need to share the same .cfg, put something with the in-game part name, with "//".

@JadeOfMaar I think ReStock and NF-P will merge very nicely, complementing each other. I find NF-P very balanced against the stock game. None of the engines or tanks are inherently better than stock, each one have specific niches where they excel, making the experience very fun and a good brain exercise, and greatly reducing part count in some cases. But I agree, don't make any sense to duplicate the parts and include them in NF-P.

[[1.6.x-1.7.x] Training Kerbalnauts (Training Laboratory + Field Training Facility)]

What would be the best version to use in a 1.4.5 install, since the recompile for this one was missed? Many thanks.

[Mod update/recompile request]

Just now, 4x4cheesecake said:

Oh no, there are no dump questions and there is nothing to excuse for! Nobody can know everything, that would be kinda boring...please never stop asking and never start to feel bad about it, that would be worse than everything else

Was more lack of attention than lack of knowledge, I didn't looked at the install files with attention. I downloaded the source code, and was finding strange to not see the files there. If I had looked at install files, I would see that my question didn't even made sense  Kopernicus is updated, but I have no ideia what should be changed in SVT to solve some problems that are being related.

Thanks 

[Mod update/recompile request]

10 minutes ago, 4x4cheesecake said:

SVT is a collection of textures and configs, there is nothing to compile The only thing required for SVT is kopernicus and it is available for 1.5.1.

There is a reason why the titel of my tutoial explicit  contains the mod name for which it is written for: You should not recompile every mod with this method! For anything more complex, I would highly recommend an IDE like visual studio or mono because you probably need to adjust more than just a few 'using' directives and without an IDE, you will have a hard time to do this. If you can do it anyway just by using a simple text editor, you'll defintly not need my tutorial

You are totally right, SVT is only textures and configs, sorry for the really dumb question.

[[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Terrain [v2.2.0] [20 March 2019]]

On 12/7/2018 at 12:02 PM, Dafni said:

Exactly.

With 1.6, I fear 1.5.1 will be skipped 

[Mod update/recompile request]

@4x4cheesecake (cool name btw), I saved your post and now I may need it. How about recompiling SVT for 1.5.1 with this method? 

[[1.11.1] Hullcam VDS Continued]

On 12/17/2018 at 9:04 AM, linuxgurugamer said:

You have to make sure you have the right transform (cameraName), and then you will have to play with three camera values:  cameraUp, cameraForward and cameraPos

Anyway to evaluate my progress without doing full reloads every time I change the values?

[Mod update/recompile request]

32 minutes ago, 4x4cheesecake said:

@sslaptnhablhat There are already some nice and working alternative mod suggested here but if you still want to use the Mastcam mod, I can explain to you how to recompile it. It is a fairly simple mod with a single source file, so this doesn't even need Visual Studio, just the .NET v3.5 framework command line compiler and a texteditor.

edit: Actually, I'll explain it anyway if anyone here is interested in it. I just don't want to create a full blown step-by-step explanation if no one wants to read it

If you make it, you'll got at least 1 reader 

[Mod update/recompile request]

How about Tarsier Space Technology?
 

 

[[WIP] Restock: KSP Part Art Revamp (Released March 06)]

@Nertea thanks for the reply! When I said it's easier, is from a player point of view (of course not the modder's one), but using Ven's Revamp as reference. Glad you agree that it's confusing, and is keeping in mind to make something clean. This way it should make no difference for us 

70 parts?  I guess it's time for the legendary Hype Train!

[A reverse switch for airbrakes]

6 hours ago, Rocket In My Pocket said:

If you're using it to decrease your speed and increase surface area, you aren't using it as a control surface, but a brake; which is what it is designed for. As far as spending fuel, I'm not sure what you mean?

But you can do that asymmetrically when enabling the control surfaces in them, opening the brakes more in one side than the other, providing great pitch and yaw control, while you slow down and increase the surface area. Spending fuel = when you don't want something slowing you down.

[[WIP] Restock: KSP Part Art Revamp (Released March 06)]

21 minutes ago, Poodmund said:

The mod will respect the stock model colliders and therefore just replace the existing stock parts' models/textures with the mod's own. This mod is intended to be a drag and drop replacement of the stock games part art assets rather than an independent mod in its own right.

With respect to the heat shields, I guess you'll just have to wait and see... I'm sure Nertea has some treats hidden up his sleeves.

Just curious  A standalone option to install would be nice, like in Porkjet's Legacy. It bring some advantages, like a lighter install with less MM patches, and usually is way easier to manage. As awesome Ven's Revamp is, sometimes is a pain to deal with all those patches