[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

78 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

76 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

74(+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

72 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

70 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

68 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

Let's hope the OP doesn't declare this against the rules and resets the score.

66 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

64 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

62 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

61 (+)

I'M NOT SEEING ENOUGH MOVEMENT!

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

61 (+)

[Hisssss]

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

61 (+)

Welcome comrade @Boorang!

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

56 (+)

THOU SHAN’T PASS!

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

52 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

50 (+)

Yes sire on my way!

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

48 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

43 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

37 (+)

YOU SHALL NOT PASS!

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

37 (+)

Galvanise the troops! 

@JPGSP @Kerballing (Got Dunked On) @FahmiRBLXian @GRS @JERONIMO @Elmo's Minion @KerbolExplorer @Willer Kerman

On 7/10/2019 at 9:23 PM, Aperture Science said:

Valid ^

Moveless post ^ (as per the definition: Move: a post clearly stating an Action and the correct resulting CN.)

Valid ^

Invalid ^

Revert to 10.

9/-1

Aperture Science be like: get nae-nae’d

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

35 (+)

We should probably take advantage of the lull in resistance to advance at speed.

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

33 (+)

[Chinese Space Program (CNSA) & Ch. commercial launch and discussion]

On 7/12/2019 at 2:59 PM, tater said:

 

I do believe I’ve missed this post. Heh.

[Chinese Space Program (CNSA) & Ch. commercial launch and discussion]

22 hours ago, tater said:

 

 

21 hours ago, tater said:

 

WAIT WHAT?

This was, uh, not expected.

Controlled deorbit or “controlled” deorbit?

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

31 (+)

[The Number Wars 2: Count to +100 or -100!]

29 (+)

Onwards, my comrades!