dprostock

Comunication....

Disney?

Nate Simpson's future after he returns from Tahiti:

Nate Simpson was an end-to-end fiasco. If he loved the KSP so much, why did he decide to include the wobbly rockets? ( Shadowzone video 13:50 ) Didn't he taste the product for which he was responsible, which he said he spent hours playing? His delirium is visualized by maintaining so much secrecy, lest someone question the disaster he was carrying out, and that this was an end user, he could not silence him and expel him. Unless his name was Scott Manley, for example. I wish I had seen the explanations for the poor quality of Early Access, obfuscating with those who questioned the crap that had come out. Barely a few weeks have passed and we are already beginning to see the questioning of his leadership, without naming names. I don't want to imagine what will be said when everyone cashes their paycheck after June and the relationship with the studio is definitively severed. In 2021 I argued that it was a Bernard Madoff-style scam, well, I was wrong. Dennis Muilenburg was in charge.

Every time I read about Nate Simpson I imagine him like this: "From the ass of the world"

Silent Hunter III Silent Hunter IV Wolves of the Pacific ( aka: Bugs of the Pacific ) Silent Hunter V Battle of the Atlantic ( aka: What's F....!? ) Der Untergang

They have, which does not mean that they are continuing the development of KSP2. And if the project continues, the worst thing that could happen from a community credibility standpoint, is that Nate continues to participate in the project in some way.

Does anyone know COBOL? I met a developer who wrote code based on a poem.

So is their failure because of decision-making, mediocre hiring, and deficit management? Why did he commit to a mega-project, right? He must have agreed to leave people like Manley, among others, out of consultation. He accepted, at least, the compartmentalization of work, didn't he? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? Replay: Video ( 15:40 ) Nate took the decisions and imposed them on the rest of the developers over the recommendations. In the video (12:30) it is made clear that the decisions were made by Nate. What I will accept is that he is not the only one responsible, since he did not assume the position by a divine lightning, someone appointed him in charge believing that he knew something. Glu, glu!

Surely you must be friends with the guy, but the truth is out there. He was told he had two years and ten million dollars and came up with a proposal that involved a mega-development of years and with a different budget. He made the decisions, he should sink tied to the helm and assume the disaster he caused by leaving so many people out of work because of their poor performance. Video: 04:30

By action or inaction. In the legislation, he is considered a "Necessary Participant". In the video (12:30) it is made clear that the decisions were made by Nate. ( first fact that there are already leaks and is being talked about ) Nate was responsible for including the "Spaghetti Rocket" ( 14:00 ) Very clearly, it is said in the video that "he meddled too much and was responsible for many of the decisions that were made in the development." Oh, beauty! Video ( 15:40 ) Nate took the decisions and imposed them on the rest of the developers over the recommendations.

Yep. The issue is who put the monkey in charge of doing whatever they wanted. If you don't have the slightest idea what the product is about or how it works... How can you feel qualified to hire people to develop it? I still think that the difference between an engineer and an "artist" is that the engineer puts his prestige and future at stake and the "artist" only lives on dreams.

Self-esteem issues. It's not a development in which you have competence. Secrecy was kept to avoid showing how poorly the project was being carried out. Anyway, I keep insisting, it's not just the monkey that's to blame, someone put him in the cockpit. "Ham" was not going to do anything but babble and push buttons.