Jump to content

Infinite Aerospace

Members
  • Posts

    420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

414 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    United Kingdom
  • Interests
    Rockets, ships (submarines in particular), machines in general

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. How is the volumetric update going for this, it's a killer planet pack. There's a work in progress volumetric patch on GitHub.
  2. Yeah I play with Kerbalism installed, can't wait to try that.
  3. I'm using it right now with Outer Planets Mod and it orbits *well* further out than Neidon, so I can't imagine there'll be a problem. Besides, even if there was just tweak the semi-major axis to fix the orbital issue. It's a nice planet to be honest so I add it to most mod lists.
  4. Still hoping someone takes on the task of volumetric-ing it. Because if, or when that happens I'd argue there's no real point in using any other planet pack.
  5. Yeah it works fine, though it doesn't seem to be being updated anymore. Though the planets are gorgeous and as long as you're not using Volumetrics, the it'll be a wonderful addition to a mod-list.
  6. Beyond Home is probably still to this date the best planet pack available to be honest. The binary stars are in particular, wonderful. You aware of anyone writing a patch for a certain volumetric clouds mod?
  7. It's one of those things that's a bit of a shame to be honest. Kerbalism is without doubt the best 'realism' orientated mod for KSP but support for it seems to be rare, compared to stuff like Snacks! As someone with little knowledge of modding (I can make Blender models and what not but never delved into Unity or the likes), is there a reason why Kerbalism is so seldom supported vs. a lot of the alternatives? Is Kerbalism not used in comparison to stuff like TAC-LS/USI-LS/Snacks? I'm going to make the assumption it's down to Kerbalism 'background simulation'? It's the only mod I've really came across that makes a consigned effort to simulate things that aren't actively happening on screen, so if there's something I'd suspect is the root cause it's that. A lot of your mods are really spot on with Kerbalism, I'm currently using Moldavite Machines/Sterling along with Nertea's entire Near Future - Far Future mods. That said, Simple Construction does indeed claim to somewhat support Kerbalism, so that could be worth a shot.
  8. Are there any construction mods, like Extra Planetary Launch Pads that work with Kerbalism? Tried a game for a while without it (Kerbalism) installed but it's just not the same like, it's like *the* life support / realism mod. At this point I'm thinking, for me at least it's as 'must have' as EVE or Scatterer.
  9. Can't claim to be surprised, doesn't play well with a fair few mods to be honest (Kerbalism).
  10. That sir is great news, this is definitely one to add to my list. As I'd like to add TAC-LS as a separate mod rather than Kerbalism, as much as I love Kerbalism it doesn't play well with a few other mods.
  11. So, am I right in thinking this preserves the Kerbalism method of science, but with *none* of the Life Support stuff. That correct?
  12. Definitely for the first part, never really came across the second part though, but that would cause an issue.
  13. You can make *any* planet pack compatible with more or less any other, as long as it isn't a system replacement. I've done it many times with many different packs. Such as combining OPM with JNSQ (complete with 2.5x rescale for OPM). You essentially just need to make sure that no bodies occupy the same place and they really should work together, assuming there's not something else in play.
  14. It's an important thing that a lot of people forget to do.
×
×
  • Create New...