Jump to content

White Rider

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketry Enthusiast
  1. I don't need to. I could easily redownload it using the old account. I've spent far more money on games that are nowhere near as fun or interesting as KSP. I don't mind paying again to fund its development.
  2. I'm sure if you strapped enough parachutes on they'd be fine... If not, you could always have some sort of detonatable shock absorbers on the bottoms of the stuff your landing. Kind of like: Parachutes, Example building, Decouplers, Structural beams acting like a pillow. Land them, then detonate the remaining crap under them.
  3. Was under her account. Ill need to setup my own one on new pc.
  4. Live in position so accommodation is free. With no rent to pay I should have a new setup on my first paycheck. :-D
  5. Just got a job offer that requires me to move tomorrow. Called me up and asked me to start the next day. They provide accommodation. Great. But the laptop I use is my fiancee's and ill need to save up for a month to buy a new one (and buy KSP again) I've not been here long, but I love this game and will miss it dearly for the next month. Have fun guys. Blow some kerbals up for me.
  6. You don't even need to go to the miniscule trouble of opening those folders any more. Literally just copy everything into your KSP main folder. And the files distribute themselves into the places they need to be on their own.
  7. Oh Christ don't... You're giving me images of the Lapcat/Skylon with that horrible EasyJet orange.
  8. That's the worst of it in my mind... Such a great opportunity for the UK to take an authoritative stance on the space market when so far they've done bugger all and it's very likely they won't take it. The last British astronaut was about 20 years ago, sans this new guy going to the ISS soon and all their launches are done via other countries launch vehicles. It would be great to see a British firm commercially produce the engines but chances are slim on that.
  9. Not quite, as the precooler tech was just a pipe dream back then. They have literally only just sorted it out pretty much the tail end of last year. That's partly why I'm particularly excited by it. With arguably the most difficult part of the project now having working prototypes finally, the project is in one of those tender situations where it could (A) stay in its current state of fairly slow progress and take another thirty years... Or ( some smart CEO will bite, and the project will take off [excuse the pun] exponentially.
  10. I too would have liked it if you were the one "doing the learning" Rune. It would mean we would be much much closer to having this beautiful bird in the air (and out of it ;D). As it stands, the project obviously still has a long way to go financially and time-wise. As Drunkrobot pointed out however, once the entire engine has been built and tested fully as a single unit rather than just the precooler being tested (as amazing as it is.) I feel that will be the kick the project needs to develop the frame and indeed the rest of the bird itself. With such innovative tech I would be surprised if no airlines at all were interested in investment. Even if one were not interested in the orbital capabilities of such a craft, the ability to go pretty much anywhere on earth in less than 4hours commercially simply shouldn't be ignored.
  11. I'm quite sure we'd still be happy to receive that kind of funding though.
  12. 1) load save. 2) you should be put on the space centre screen. 3) look at the top left. 4) smash your face against a desk.
  13. Apologies Rune, the £380m figure was from a few months back. I misread.. that was the number they (at the time) needed to really "get the project off the ground." Whatever that meant. The source was BBC. In 2010 the full project number was apparently somewhere in the region of £12billion so your figure of 19 seems reasonable enough to assume its correct as far as we are likely to be aware.
  14. I wouldn't be surprised if Branson ponied up the cash. He's done stranger things. The quoted figure is reportedly around £380m. Not in the billions like DARPAs projects. They already have the hardest part (effectively) done. That figure is obviously BS, and will no doubt rise significantly but still a drop in the water compared to other projects with as much substace as edible paper.
×
×
  • Create New...