Jump to content

zxczxczbfg

Members
  • Posts

    334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zxczxczbfg

  1. And the kerbals could be just floating around in the cabin.

    No! Bad idea! Acceleration, remember!

    IMO, I think we just need more "regular" capsules*. Procedural capsules would have difficulties that procedural fairings wouldn't; crew capacity wouldn't scale linearly, the weight would go up much faster than the diameter (square-cube laws, heh), any integrated ladders would have to scale in length but not width, any hatches would specifically have to not scale, the RCS capacity and internal batteries would be hard to scale accurately if the crew capacity changes (more space for Kerbals means less space for anything else), reaction wheel strength would have to scale nonlinearly (due to the aforementioned square-cube laws).

    * A four-man 2.5m capsule springs to mind so that we can carry our new Orange Suit along with her co-workers.

  2. Tried an automatic LKO deorbit system for capsules, essentially just a bunch of Separatrons pointed backwards.

    Unfortunately, I decided to test them almost immediately after jettisoning my orbital maneuvering stage, without changing course or otherwise shifting my orbit, resulting in the test capsule slamming into the maneuvering stage.

    Thankfully the capsule was unharmed, but as its rockets had been spent I had to send up a rescue tug to nudge it into a suborbital trajectory.

×
×
  • Create New...