Jump to content

Fengist

Members
  • Posts

    1,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1,399 Excellent

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • About me
    Swabbie

Recent Profile Visitors

10,455 profile views
  1. Have you ever gotten a hamburger at a fast food joint that looked anything like the one on the menu? You seem surprised to have received a product that's inferior to what was promised in all the marketing hype. Steam charts showed on Friday that over 25,000 people were playing KSP2. That's over $1.25 million gross on day one. I'd say that all those promises you quoted worked exactly as intended, just like the pictures of that tasty hamburger. Now that you realize that marketing never reflects reality, all you can do now is decide if you're hungry enough to try the fries.
  2. I've watched a lot of the videos on ksp2. In-space ship building, wind generators, roads multi-player, etc. I feel like I was told I was gonna get the BigMac that was on the fancy menu and what I paid for is a burger that looks like it's been smashed by steam roller.
  3. Just ran some tests. It's not the particles. Either way, 6fps sucks.
  4. Have to admit, Atlas had the most horrid launch ever and it ran better than this.
  5. Asus laptop Ryzen 9 6900hs - 16gb ram - RX6700S w/8gb vram In Kerbin orbit kss station core - 25fps looking toward Kerbin - 50fps looking away. Stock jet 4 on the runway 25fps - flying looking skyward 45fps - flying looking at ocean 27fps - sitting in the vab 50fps Simple rovemax rover sitting on the mun 25 fps. GPU stays at 100pct, vram t 6.6 gb I would expect better from this machine.
  6. Didn't have nearly that issue when using other jets.
  7. So, I'm running a laptop with a Ryzen 9, 16g ram and a 6700m. Not a great gaming machine but no slouch either. Frame rates have been pretty lousy but playable (I expected much better). That is till I tried rapiers. Built a pretty basic ssto with 4 rapiers. Soon as I fired them up on the runway, frame rate dropped to abt 2 fps.
  8. Yep. Already took a look at hydrodynamics and wow. Not only are wave physics pretty insane, under water visibility is pretty much 0. A lot of this will need fixing before I even think about a new Maritime Pack.
  9. I initially got permission to work with the code for Vertical when I started 1869. After looking it over it didn't do many of the things I was interested in so I wrote the code for 1969 from scratch.
  10. Thanks Mav. Still have a little delta V left.
  11. Not at this time. I'm waiting on KSP2 before I do any more modding.
  12. Had issues with CKAN years ago with them publishing my work without my permission. Haven't looked at it since.
  13. From what I read, many of the Boeing engineers played KSP and T2 provided them with the plushie. I'm assuming this was not a money thing.
  14. Even more proof that his potential contributions to every field of science as a highly calibrated instrument are utterly boundless.
  15. Not scientific? Can you think of another instrument that would have given a better representation of the lack of gravitational influence AND could easily survive explosive decompression AND be smiling about it the entire time? How dare you underestimate the unwavering devotion of Jeb. He IS the ultimate scientific instrument!
×
×
  • Create New...