Jump to content

Rocket Powered Trains


Tommygun

Recommended Posts

That clip is nearly 40 years old. Older than many people here on the forum.

The main reason the locomotive is powered by rockets is a lack of space. The track they use is simply not long enough to get up to the required speed in the regular way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't need rockets for it.

UK did a normal test with a derailed full train, locomotive and vagons, in 1984. It was to ensure the safety of the nuclear flasks carrying spent fuel from old Magnox reactors.

It was broadcasted over BBC television to the general public, too. There was even a confused Greenpeace nutter in the studio doing their standard "lalala, can't hear you" chant when presented with empirical data.

Properly made, transportation flasks are virtually indestructible by common accidents. 14 inch thick steel in the 1984 Magnox case. Cooling fins will buckle here and there, but that's it.

I suppose an extremely powerful hydrogen nuclear bomb could penetrate it if it was next to it, but then you wouldn't need to worry about the flask, would you?

Edited by lajoswinkler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that hard to lay more track and they are in the middle of a desert, so space shouldn't have been an issue.

Maybe it was a momentum issue? It looked like the rocket motors were still burning when the locomotive hit the target-- maybe that was their way of simulating the momentum of a fully loaded train, without actually having to have a fully loaded train?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it was a momentum issue? It looked like the rocket motors were still burning when the locomotive hit the target-- maybe that was their way of simulating the momentum of a fully loaded train, without actually having to have a fully loaded train?

I think in the British test (6 minutes into video) they mentioned that they placed three cars on the train and that adding more wouldn't have added to the force of the impact.

Adding more track and cars I think would have been more sensible. To me this is an over engineered answer to a simple problem.

You might even make an argument that the results of the test are not truly as actuate as they could have been, because they didn't use a more real world train set up as the British did.

In any case it makes for great YouTube videos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...