Jump to content

Pluto Planet Status


Voyager275

Recommended Posts

What I find particularly odd is the very next decision made AFTER downgrading Pluto, was to say that Dwarf Planets aren't any kind of Planet.

Why a name like "Dwarf Planet" when it isn't even recognized as a sub-class of a Planet?

Because astronomers rely in large part on public funding and issuing a press release laden with very precise jargon almost certainly does not bring in the funding dollars.

If you want a real travesty of terminology, try figuring out why we still use herpetology to cover reptiles and amphibians, but not birds (hint: it's actually because bird lovers hate us dirty herpers :) ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want a real travesty of terminology, try figuring out why we still use herpetology to cover reptiles and amphibians, but not birds (hint: it's actually because bird lovers hate us dirty herpers :) ).

I suspect it's far more because it wasn't obvious until very recently that birds should be included in that clade: no other living reptile has feathers or an endothermic metabolism or can fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect it's far more because it wasn't obvious until very recently that birds should be included in that clade: no other living reptile has feathers or an endothermic metabolism or can fly.

Archaeopteryx has been known for a century and a half. Even without detailed cladistics, it's been obvious that birds evolved from dinosaurs for basically as long as we've known about evolution.

I was only half kidding, by the way. The real reason almost certainly is due to very mundane human interests, or so I've heard from good authority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because astronomers rely in large part on public funding and issuing a press release laden with very precise jargon almost certainly does not bring in the funding dollars.
The endless releases about water on Mars, extrasolar Earth twins, etc. get annoying after a while though. And they distract from the cool weird things we find.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find particularly odd is the very next decision made AFTER downgrading Pluto, was to say that Dwarf Planets aren't any kind of Planet.

Why a name like "Dwarf Planet" when it isn't even recognized as a sub-class of a Planet?

The reasoning behind that, at least that's what I think, is to give the pro-Pluto-planet camp some sort of consolation.

They should have just used plutoid instead of dwarf-planet. I know Pluto is a plutoid, but that's only because it's an icy tran-Neptunian dwarf-planet.

It would have been easier to sell to Pluto fans if it was brought like this: "Pluto isn't a planet any more, instead it's a plutoid. The king among likely classified objects in the universe."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The endless releases about water on Mars, extrasolar Earth twins, etc. get annoying after a while though. And they distract from the cool weird things we find.

I'm with you there. It's that way with a lot of sciences unfortunately, things get a ridiculous dressing of buzzwords and misleading headlines (is a planet with double earth's mass and surface temps comparable to Mercury or even Venus really earth's identical twin?) so that even things that really are interesting get obfuscated and you suspect every headline is 75% BS. Remember when the Higgs Boson was detected and nobody could shut up with the "god particle" nonsense, to the point that people thought this actually had something to do with religious concepts?

But that's sadly what brings the money, is it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archaeopteryx has been known for a century and a half. Even without detailed cladistics, it's been obvious that birds evolved from dinosaurs for basically as long as we've known about evolution.

I was only half kidding, by the way. The real reason almost certainly is due to very mundane human interests, or so I've heard from good authority.

I thought birds were in th clade Dinosauria?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought birds were in th clade Dinosauria?

It's complicated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archosaur

Cladistic taxonomy and Linnaean taxonomy for this entire group are ludicrously at odds. Reptiles as popularly defined (squamates, crocodilians, chelonians, tuataras) really have no business being grouped together. Turns out "it has scales" isn't the greatest diagnostic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because astronomers rely in large part on public funding and issuing a press release laden with very precise jargon almost certainly does not bring in the funding dollars.

I'm just saying that if I decided something wasn't a planet, I wouldn't give it a technical name that had 'planet' in it. Neither Dwarf Planet nor Minor Planet makes much sense for a non-planet. Just come up with something new. The etymology of "Planetoid" ("Sorta like but not quite a planet") makes much better sense than "Dwarf Planet" ("Little Planet"), but nobody ever seems to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The etymology of "Planetoid" ("Sorta like but not quite a planet") makes much better sense than "Dwarf Planet" ("Little Planet"), but nobody ever seems to use it.

Planetoid is the name for a dwarf planet in the asteroid belt, some languages even use planetoid(or something similar to it) for asteroids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, yeah.

Earlier in this thread, we've established that, etymologically, planets are wandering stars, so Jupiter is a star, right?

That question has actually caused some debates on what a star technically is

Edited by Voyager275
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...