Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Ultimate Steve said:

I don't think that multiple passes would significantly reduce fuel usage unless I'm missing something. It depends on if you would ever hit terminal velocity during Mars descent. If no, then coming in from a lower trajectory would allow you to slightly reduce Mars landing burn fuel requirements. If yes then there is no difference unless for some reason you can't brake into Mars orbit via aero alone, which, should be possible unless you're absolutely screaming into the system on an accelerated transfer.

Current thinking is that direct aero to landing won’t work for crewed without capture burn, iirc.  G forces I think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ship landed, didn't blow up but was not the happiest. Distinct heating and actual wrinkles in the steel visible from the rear-pointing camera. Probably why it broke on hitting the water.

That we could actually see it happen thanks to the daylight landing is a great thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Successful landing!

The results of the past three flights have been very good omens for the survivability of the ship once they put people on board. Not so good omens for the goal of a rapidly reusable heat shield, but hopefully that's something V2 will address.

They put this ship through a very aggressive re-entry, with a decent chunk of the tiles missing, and other tiles testing various other things, and she made it through with less visible damage than the previous two flights.

Lots of wonderful camera views!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...  Comment. 

One of my kids who I got all excited about this in class looked it up in the news and asked 'why isn't anyone reporting on this - why isn't it front page news?'.  Gave the usual reply.  Politics.  Celebrity gossip, etc. 

 

But I now perceive more.  SX is succeeding in making it feel routine.  

 

Case in point - remember the sheer number and speed of posts for SN15? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They said that this was an older heatshield without the ablative layer, too.

And what about that rear view of the engines? Fascinating, and proof that the tail is the less extreme area for heating. Even if that bright trail was a little worrying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zolotiyeruki said:

Was any reason given for the no-go on the catch?

Very windy there, Ellie in space had problems holding on to her hat. 
Now for falcon 9 no landing  conditions is an scrub reason unless customer pay extra, but I guess they don't plan on reusing this first stage anyway and focus is second stage reentry, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AckSed said:

Here's an accelerated look at Ship's re-entry. You can see the wrinkle in the steel form:

 

Consider how quickly we’ve adapted to ZERO plasma blackout.  
 

We KSP’ers are accustomed to having access to the craft in all phases of flight, lol

 Seriously though, Starlink rules for reentry comms

Edited by darthgently
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...