Jump to content

The MachingBird Revive! 0.90 update


Recommended Posts

The MachingBird Challenge!

Yes, I am reviving The MachingBird Challenge..... AGAAAAIN as it was lost in the server revival

The Maching Bird Challenge: How fast can you go on jet power?

Top speed will be measured by Highest Speed Over Land in the Flight Log, to prevent artificial inflation that can be caused via sub-orbital hops.

Read the rules, people!

Rules:

1. Must be jet powered only! The craft may not use any oxidizer, monopropellant, or Xenon.

-a. R.A.P.I.E.R. engine is not a jet. It is an aspirated rocket.

2. Must take off horizontally from the runway (need not retain landing gear for the duration of the flight)

3. Screenshots! Must have screenshots of:

-a. Your craft on the runway (preferrably moving).

-a2 Your craft from front view

-b. Your craft in flight.

-c. Your craft's Flight Log (can be accessed by pressing F3) This is neccessary, as top speed will be measured by Highest Speed Over Land

--c1. For clarification, no, you are not allowed to jump out of your craft then take the flightlog screenshot.

-d. The resources tab must be open at all times, as proof of appropriate fuel usage. This rule will be strictly enforced to ensure capsule MonoProp is not used!

-e. Any staging events that happen, such as drop-tanks, launch stages, wheel drops, etcetera.

4. Use of the dev console, particularly for part clipping, is exploitative and will be considered cheating. People who part clip will be put in a special catagory, If you are part cliping and not telling you will be banned from this competition

5. Planes that do not exceed mach 6 wont be added..... sorry

6. This is primarily a stock challenge, so only stock parts are allowed, along with no other mods being installed. This means that CFG modding will earn you a permanent ban from the challenge.

Exceptions are as such:

Mechjeb FAR DRE

Mechjeb and FAR will have their own sub winners circle DRE is just making it yourself harder i guess.

Dont forget to add the craft's name!!!

Also a new 0.90 list has been added since that update adds a whole bunch more control to the game and just makes craft possible that where impossible in 0.25 please do note if oyur plane is 0,90 or 0,25 otherwise you will be disqualified

There will be a price for most original design, ill deside whats original.

Please Clarify whether your craft is manned or unmanned.

Yes, I know I can look to see if there are pilots, but I'd like to keep myself from HAVING to do that.

Special Commendations and Notes

Mach-6 club: Meet or exceed mach 6, or 2056.2 m/s (round to 2056 m/s).

True Maching Bird: exceed 2300 m/s

Modded entry's will be denied with the exeption of Mechjeb FAR and DRE

0.90 winners

1.zipmafia: 2341 m/s in the Gnat [First 0,90 machingbird]

Previous winners:

Stock Manned

1.Lesbiotic: 2377 m/s in the Orithyia[True Machingbird]

2.Nicky4096: 2377 m/s in the J17,5 [True Machingbird]

3.Pbhead: 2376 m/s in the Maximum 8irhog Mk.8[True Machingbird]

4.Nicky4096: 2375 m/s in the J15 [True Machingbird]

5.O-Doc: 2375 m/s in the White Diamond IV[True Machingbird]

6.The.HengeProphet: 2372 m/s in the RST-5[True Machingbird]

7.Claw:2364 m/s in the Bottle Rocket[True Machingbird]

8.LaMulaVerde: 2359 m/s in the The One[True Machingbird]

9.barrenwaste: 2356 m/s in the Stargazer[True Machingbird]

10.astrobond: 2352 m/s in This new bird [Truemachingbird]

11.CocoDaPuf 2345 m/s in the Icarus [True machingBird]

13.Hoioh: 2343 m/s in the ??? [True Maching bird]

13.Kasuha: 2341 m/s in the Mach Much[True Machingbird]

14.wathyroidis: 2334 m/s in the Dashpeet[True Machingbird]

15.Spartwo: 2329 m/s in the Arrow[True Machingbird]

16.Sqwazare: 2318 m/s in the Sparrow [True Machingbird]

17.Silverchain: 2311 m/s in the Aeris 3f "Wicked Felina"[True Machingbird]

18.Halo_003: 2311 m/s in the unnamed craft[True Machingbird]

19.1greywind" 2306 m/s in the Firestrom[True Machingbird]

20.astrobond: 2304 m/s in the Fun Speedy Plane [True Machingbird]

Bonus:TheAnimePug: 2294 m/s in the EarthShip [Mach-6 club

Note: this list is a top twenty so anything lower then these will not be added

Stock Unmanned

1.Capi3101:2246 m/s in the Rhea-7 [Mach-6 club][True Missreading Bird (on my end)]

2.Extemporary: 2223 m/s in the U-1[Mach-6 Club]

Mechjeb:

Nicky4096: 2372 in the J16 [True MechjebBird]

FAR

Most original craft:

Nicky4096: 2375 m/s in the J15 [True Machingbird][True FabulousBird]

part clippers:

Please note if you think your plane was missjudged or names have been spelled wrong post a replie down below be sure to remove that replie if the isseu is fixed, thank you

Edited by TheAnimePug
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll re-place my previous entry:

http://imgur.com/a/jzm4c

Top speed: 2342m/s stock manned, true machingbird

List is updated, also you imgur link seems to be broken try: [ imgur ]"code"[ /imgur ] you code being the highlited stuff: http://imgur.com/a/jzm4c remove spaces between the imgurs and the [ ] 's and it should work

Edited by TheAnimePug
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, most excellent. Okay, here was my late entry from the other thread:

Stock, unmanned, no mods used (though plenty installed). Final speed 2246. Should've tried a little harder - could've got a True Machingbird with another 50 m/s. Maybe when I have some time - the Kadvent Kalendar's got me tied up pretty good at the moment. I think I could get more speed from the Rhea if I flattened out the ascent profile a bit.

Edited by capi3101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i re submit my 2375 m/s entry:

(stock manned)

http://imgur.com/a/AA51N

thanks for reviving it :)

EDIT: im not really sure what place i would be in, because im tied with o-doc.

im fine with it if you put me under o-doc though :)

Seems pretty good but i mpretty sure its part clipped right? ill put it in that catagory for now okay?

Edited by TheAnimePug
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems pretty good but i mpretty sure its part clipped right? ill put it in that catagory for now okay?

errrr its not part clipped.

i didnt use the dev console, i basically flipped 8 cubic struts backwards into an octo strut, then mounted 8 ram intakes onto those 8 mountpoints, and then put two cubic struts on the end of it so that it didnt fly apart.

its tricky, but possible even without the dev console.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is such a boring challenge as it's stupid easy to get to 2300 but impossible to get to 2400.

actually its possible to get above 2400 on turbojets alone. without "cheating"

lesbiotic went 2418 m/s in orthyia super.

and its not a boring challenge because you can get every number inbetween.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

errrr its not part clipped.

i didnt use the dev console, i basically flipped 8 cubic struts backwards into an octo strut, then mounted 8 ram intakes onto those 8 mountpoints, and then put two cubic struts on the end of it so that it didnt fly apart.

its tricky, but possible even without the dev console.

Ill believe you :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually its possible to get above 2400 on turbojets alone. without "cheating"

lesbiotic went 2418 m/s in orthyia super.

and its not a boring challenge because you can get every number inbetween.

where is he on the leaderbord? And even if he was able to do it, it's quite boring because it's not done on turbojet power, it's done with gravity or infiniglide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where is he on the leaderbord? And even if he was able to do it, it's quite boring because it's not done on turbojet power, it's done with gravity or infiniglide.

if you are just here to hate please go away we are here to have fun no matter what you say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting design it didn't exceed mach 6 though so i wont be adding it try harder :P

Err.....your rules up at the top of the thread say the Mach6 criterion is 2056 m/s and the criterion being judged is the Highest Speed Over Land in the Flight Log, which I provided in the second to last slide and clearly says 2246 m/s (as also indicated in my entry post). Last I checked 2246 > 2056, so..........how did the design NOT achieve Mach 6?

My finger's hovering over the shenanigans button here. Fair warning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Err.....your rules up at the top of the thread say the Mach6 criterion is 2056 m/s and the criterion being judged is the Highest Speed Over Land in the Flight Log, which I provided in the second to last slide and clearly says 2246 m/s (as also indicated in my entry post). Last I checked 2246 > 2056, so..........how did the design NOT achieve Mach 6?

My finger's hovering over the shenanigans button here. Fair warning.

Sorry i legitly missread your post will update you to the list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

List is updated, also you imgur link seems to be broken try: [ imgur ]"code"[ /imgur ] you code being the highlited stuff: http://imgur.com/a/jzm4c remove spaces between the imgurs and the [ ] 's and it should work

Yeah, I did that, it works fine for me and I know it's case-sensitive. Bit odd that it doesn't work for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So could I get a quick rule clarification? On the clipping rule, it sounds like we just can't use the console to enable full clipping, right? Like as long as a part is placed legally in SPH, we're good?

For example, I have a space plane here (so obviously not an entry) but as far as clipping is concerned, there's some aesthetic stuff that technically clips some parts together in a couple places. This would still be fine right?

0ITGW8K.jpg

Secondly, this part:

Top speed will be measured by Highest Speed Over Land in the Flight Log, to prevent artificial inflation that can be caused via sub-orbital hops.

Does this mean that the flight is not permitted to leave the atmosphere? Thanks.

Edit: sorry, one last thing. I know this is an all stock parts challenge. The only mods I use are visual (eve, distant object enhancement) and kerbal engineer, is that all fine?

Edited by CocoDaPuf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if Nicky's entries are legit, then yours definitely is. He uses a stock technique to place 8 Ram intakes on a single octagonal strut by clipping 2 cubic struts into it WITHOUT using the F12 console. He then stacks these in rows on either side of the "plane" to get as much as possible intake to weight ratio, which he then carries to altitude with a couple wings so the it can actualy get up there. Then he ditches the wings and accelerates to infinity and beyond, or he gives it a good try at least, he's a lot faster than I am that's for certain.

Anyway, the first part of that story is where he clips the intakes into the strut and as far as I can tell previous entries that have been legalized used this or similar techniques.

I vote legal.

(I am a sinner though, my own entry took too much time to legally clip those intakes into the wings and stuff, so I just used the console for a bit in order to actualy get somewhere. I tried the strut clipping technique using a guide with images and all, but my machine just doesn't like it and at some point will refuse to place certain intakes, while the rest is just fine. From my own point of view I'm doing something far closer to real possibilities as Nicky because it's completely rediculous to have 8 objects in the same place, while having intakes attached or even part of a hull is the most normal thing in the world.)

I like the plane design by the way, looks good! won't go quite up to 2300 though without the rockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...