Mycroft Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -24(-) gee I sure wish I could put -100 and be done already. Just now, DarkOwl57 said: Aw, come on @adsii1970, again? He did nothing wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frybert Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -23(+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) No no no. @adsii1970 put -23 when there should have been -22. Let's stop this before someone goes back when we have -99. Edited December 3, 2016 by DarkOwl57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsii1970 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -22 (-1) based off that positives always win skirmishes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 STOP!!!!! Let @Dman979 fix this before it goes too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 5 minutes ago, DarkOwl57 said: -22 - 3 minutes ago, Frybert said: -21(+) 3 minutes ago, adsii1970 said: -23 (-1) *Watching who wins current skirmish* Darkowl, I see nothing wrong with this sequence. Adsii1970 won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 @DarkOwl57 is talking about this 4 minutes ago, Frybert said: -21(+) 4 minutes ago, adsii1970 said: -23 (-1) *Watching who wins current skirmish* they are 1 minute apart, that looks like a skirmish to me, @Deutherius and @Dman979, thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Aight, carry on I guess. -23 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Last valid post is Frybert's -23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Wait... -24 - I'M HAVING PROBLEMS CATCHING UP!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Just now, Dman979 said: Last valid post is Frybert's -23. and I was as fast as a turtle lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsii1970 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -25 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frybert Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -24(+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -25 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 15 hours ago, Deddly said: I tell you what, I was going to save this for later but I couldn't help noticing that a lot of people don't like me doing this, so I'm going to jump straight to exhibit C. This post was edited an hour before the next one: Should make this one the last valid number: Correct? Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsii1970 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, JoseEduardo said: @DarkOwl57 is talking about this they are 1 minute apart, that looks like a skirmish to me, @Deutherius and @Dman979, thoughts? Both posts show 7 minutes ago in your original post, and I was the last poster, yet again, um discredited... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I knew something wasn't right about those reverts... Oh and -26(-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Wait... So what number are we at? cause if it's back to -90 I'm going to jump for joy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deutherius Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) You can mouse over the timestamp to get precise date and time of posting. EDIT: Works for edit timestamps as well... Wait a few minutes and mouse over mine. Edited December 3, 2016 by Deutherius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanamonde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Play the game or don't play the game. Nobody enjoys these arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Mycroft said: Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that. actually, if you hover your mouse over the "Edited bla bla bla ago" text it shows when it occurred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Just now, Mycroft said: Hmm. Come to think of it, how do you know that it wasn't edited after the other post? The precise time stamp is the only way to prove it. But the forums no longer have a timstamp showing more than what day it was posted on. So you have no proof that either of your 'reverts' were actually edited before the next post. Unless you weren't being straight when you said you just recently joined, and you were actually there. I was there, and I remember differently. Please prove that. Mouse over the timestamp of the edit, and both posts. It's finicky, but it's there. 1 minute ago, adsii1970 said: Both posts show 7 minutes ago in your original post, and I was the last poster, yet again, um discredited... Not sure what you mean here. Your post was valid, and Frybert's was not. Then Mycroft posted and sent it to -24, and Frybert changed it to -23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 SO WHAT NUMBER ARE WE AT?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseEduardo Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Just now, DarkOwl57 said: SO WHAT NUMBER ARE WE AT?!?!? V 3 minutes ago, Mycroft said: I knew something wasn't right about those reverts... Oh and -26(-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsii1970 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 -26 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts