Ω

Do you mind installing some graphical packs? The thing is, I don't want to buy an underpowered card, but I don't want an overpowered card. Alphasus sugested that I get a R9 380, but AMD doesn't have good Linux drivers. I *think* the 960 may be slightly overpowered, but i really have no benchmarks or anything to go on for KSP.

So I've decided to scrap Windows, and instead go for Ubuntu, which means I have to get NVIDIA because of superior drivers apparently. I was looking at the 960 and the 950. Will the 950 be okay 1080p @ 60fps with high quality visual packs? KSP doesn't really need a lot of GPU power (or so I'm told).

I like this build, but will KSP with some visual packs really take full advantage of the 380? I was thinking something along the lines of the 950 or the R7 370.

Hello, I am going to build a new PC, and I want some recommendations. The only game I play is Kerbal Space Program. I play with Realism Overhaul, and a bunch of other mods. I would also like to run RSS Visual Enhancements 60 fps 1080p. My Budget is 800 - $1000. I don’t really care about overclocking, unless a K chip is a really good deal. I prefer Intel over AMD for processors, but I really don’t care about a specific video card manufacturer. Also, how does the new multithreaded physics calculations in 1.0.5 affect things?