youkofoxy

I do like some of the new models... but I do dislike some... like the Whiplash, because is the "same" as the Goliath. I would like a more "Rolls-Royce BR700" style Aerospike... well, where is the spike? I mean: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Non-truncated_toroidal_aerospike_nozzle.jpg that's what I talking about. serious, the aerospike... can you change that... would you? please. also, I dislike the radial air intake, but I allways disliked that thing, and the Intake Fuselage... feels kind wrong to me. the rest? is nice, quite nice...

me??? mostly Monstercat. in particular the 14 discovery and 16 expedition albums. check out this expedition music:

Can we have thermal shock?? please!?

Now... we need Fish in the game...

Nice point, today everbody says: NASA computer, NASA technology, NASA scientist, etc. Now imagine if the Russians managed to land on the moon first. Rocosmo Computer...

honestamente??? acho que você deve mesmo é excluir o jogo com tudo e baixar ele novamente. e bem.... esqueça os mods, por um tempo. no momento muito mods de embelezamento estão causando problemas na renderização tal como maquiagem barata na pele... logo o seu problema pode ser os mods. sobre os drives?? bem eu uso o gerenciador de hardware para descobrir quais são... mas faz tempo que eu formatei um PC, em geral eu vou no site do fabricante e entro o modelo. isso pode ser feito para quase qualquer Hardware, uma pena que a Realtek tenha problema em dizer qual é o drive para sua placa. P.S.: meu conhecimento leva a conclusão de quanto mais mods você tem, mais você estraga o jogo, seja por coisas sem sentido, seja por bugs e conflito entre mods... por exemplo, tewak escale tem varios problemas por si proprio, e eu acho que ele tá incomodado o FAR na minha instalação...

começe com o foguete inclinado aprox 5 da horizontal, apenas um pouco inclinado para ser mais facil o resto da manobra. quando ele chegar a 200 metros por segundo começe a inclinar a gosto, de acordo com a altitude da apoapsis e distancia dela. via de regra, abaixo dos 55 km se você estiver subido acima de 100 na velocidade vetical, você deve apontar para o horizonte. a passo que se você estiver a menos de 10 na velocidade vertical, você deve apontar para cima. em fato voce manter sua velocidade de subida sempre perto de 100 ou mais. outra dica, se você estiver a mais de 70 km com um velocidade horizontal maior que 1500 m/s você vai quere passar da apoapsis para efetuar a manobra de cicularização. toda a manobra depende do seu design, assim em um foguete de baixa relação peso propulsão você vai quere fazer a manobra antes da apoapsis. porém a manobra de circularização é muito mais eficiente se realizada depois da apoapsis. desculpe o paredão de texto mal corrigido, apesar de PT-BR ser meu idioma nativo, isso não quer dizer que eu sou bom com ele. P.S.: todo bom foguete consegue inclinar 5 graus logo no começo, se o seu não consegue, ou se consegue, acaba no chão, considere colocar mais capacidade de manobra e mais propulsão respectivamente, se ele balança muito ou se quebra, lembre-se de colocar mais fita adesiva.

Mangnesium Tungsten Beryllium Osmium Lithium Silicon in my opinion, you should use prices a factor. titanium is awesome, but very expensive and aluminium have it's advantagens, but is more expensive that iron. just check these videos out:

7/10 poor Engineering nice concept. VSB-30

I think the term for someone who does it (what I did) is "HALO drop" But "Bomb Drop" fits best. procedural good? well, the XCOM fans were screaming with signs reading: "Procedural Maps now" and they were happy when it was announced that each map would be procedural. On the other hand, fans of The Elders Scrolls, know that Arena was criticized for "more of the same everywhere" Furthermore, Portal does not use this technique in their levels, but Invisible Inc uses. and Okami does not use procedural in its characters, but it's not hard to find a game that has its characters generated by a program such as Human make. like any piece of code, there are those who are incredible and those who are a disgrace. and the matter interesting? Mars is the sheer lack of variation, but the Earth is incredible on variation... in fact, although forest be ... well, forest. every corner of the amazon forest is different. Now, walk in a pine forest ... is incredible despite the view is almost the same as of a desert, in terms of change ... at least that's what I think, I never walked into one. the only solution is to mix even the best key to making a unique environment. handcrafted with procedural more seasons. this is my solution to your dialema. when more techniques better, is what the Terminator 2 taught us about tricking the brain. when you think you understand it, everything has changed and you are lost again in a familiar environment, but unknown for some reason.

by me I'd get all the code, responsible for the heat system, and throw it in the nearest trash can. it lacks several things as: thermal shock, change of Thermal Properties, change of mechanical Properties .... and who said a dry fuel tank explodes when exposed to room temperature? it is made of what? explodonium? on the aero dynamics, is "acceptable", but could use some improvements (serious Improvements). more important to me than adjust the aero dynamics is to treat the syndrome of the water table with tessellation. seriously, the frames per second passes from "not good" to "excellent" just pointing the camera at Kerbol, and everybody here knows that look at a star is not healthy.

if someone don't already know, this channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/AgentJayZ is from a guy who work with Jet Engines, and him may anwser your question... or you can check just to see Jet engines be tested.

my opinion? just make the atmosphere bigger (from 70 km to 100 km). and the aerodynamics model need improvements, I played with NEAR, and the new model don't feel right...

a 'simulator' where I can spend hours building a spacecraft that could fly in the real world with some modifications and adjustments. in other words, something that an engineer like Dave Jones from EEvblog, look and say, maybe this works. and then travel in a fictional solar system, but plausible (nothing breaks the physical rules) and enjoy planets that have one or other interesting thing to look at, or may change over time. this would be a mix of several games ... such as No Man Sky, orbiter, Space ENGINERS a guy can dream, can not he? PS: I do not mind spending 10 hours putting hundreds of meters in cables on a plane, just to be able to travel on a planet full of things to see ..

I think he needs a little more TWR or ISP. besides solving the overheating problem Right now Terrier is better for most applications, except when you use an insane amount of fuel. in fact, it is more advantageous to use multiple Terriers than using a single NERV in Cash and Delta-V term. my test shows, for a 30 thousand SpaceCraft, Delta V increase of 2576 for the NERV. in other words, the engine (mainly) turned into scrap metal/museum piece to have just for curiosity. the only advantage to use it? a bit better TWR, a little more of Delta-V, less wobble and part count (16 agaisnt 40). P.S.: I regretted using 300 points of science to unlock it, was a very stupid decision.