Fikakillen

Banned for discussing the difference between sense and cents.

Im glad you liked them! First I planned to use EAS-seats for control, but found no good-looking place to put the seat. No kerbals used, no kerbals risked.

Hello ladies and gentlekerbals! Let me present to you: The Hummingbird Series: Which includes: * Hummingbird Mk2 Standard * Hummingbird Mk2 Rescuer *Hummingbird Mk2 Ranger Hummingbird Mk2 Standard: * Built for versatility * Stable flight due to multiple SAS-systems * Able to hover. * Can start from anywhere, land or ocean. Action Groups: 1: Forward Thrust 2: Upwards Thrust (hover) 3: Backwards Thrust Description: Developed for versatility, the Hummingbird uses 3 sets of engines for maximum control, which is also aided by multiple SAS-systems. It's the model the Rescuer and Ranger are based on. Download: https://kerbalx.com/Fikakillen/Hummingbird-Mk2 Hummingbird Mk2 Rescuer: * Built for rescue missions * Adds two EAS-1 seats for keeping kerbals onboard * Able to hover * Can start from anywhere, land or ocean Action Groups: 1: Forward Thrust 2: Upwards Thrust (hover) 3: Backwards Thrust Description: Developed for rescuing kerbals, the Rescuer uses the same engine and SAS-system setup as the standard model, with the addition of two EAS-1 seats for picking up kerbals. Download: https://kerbalx.com/Fikakillen/Hummingbird-Mk2-Rescuer Hummingbird Mk2 Ranger: * Built for long range flights * Has double the fuel capacity of a standard Hummingbird * Unable to hover (hover engines may however aid landing procedures) * Can only start from land (not tested in water) Action Groups: 1: Forward Thrust 2: Upwards Thrust (landing aid) 3: Backwards Thrust 4: Decouple external fuel tanks Description: Built for longer range missions, the Ranger uses the same engine and SAS-system setup as the standard model, with two external fuel tanks for extra flighttime. Download: https://kerbalx.com/Fikakillen/Hummingbird-Mk2-Ranger Any critique more then welcome! I hope you enjoy my crafts! *

Banned for busting myths.

I dig a tunnel network under your hill, leading to collapse. My collapsed hill.

I refill the crater with gravel. My gravel hill.

Banned for banning me for a low level of posts

Banned for forgetting the reason to ban the previous user.

Two words. Tactical Nuke. My hill

I would say this seems like a dumb idea. Not because it wont be able to run mods or that it will sell bad. Mainly because you WILL have to make it much simpler, mainly the rocket-building. It will also (probably) be as previous people said, ''modless'', which removes a big part of the KSP community. I do think that stock KSP is fun, but without mods it will become more linear the more you play. Though it may be so that it has better performance, but glitches dont care for your hardware. Either way, i hope for the best, maybe we will get something good out of this.

Nice one, cant wait for the .CRAFT file!

Hey! You there! Do you need a mediocre/good airplane to fly around in? Then ,I present to you The Firefox, one of my first aircrafts on the forums. It's a (pretty) good aircraft for aerial maneuvers, weapon testing or trying to surf on water. (not safe to surf with.) And I of course has some obligatory aerial shots The Firefox It does lift off the runway pretty early too. Download :http://bit.ly/1xKCoNR