ProximaCentauri12

Because the Energia is not a commercially competitive vehicle, and is far beyond Roscosmos's ability to fund.

What was the logic in releasing this update when the landing gear and landing legs are still so pathetically broken (amongst a plethora of other bugs that were in the bug tracker and evidently never fixed)? The heaviest "landing legs" in the game can't even hold up a single metric ton of loading without sinking into the ground. Unlike the pre-release, there's no way to back out of this broken build and revert to 1.0.5 for the purpose of having a relatively unbroken game.

Unless it is a movie based on historical events (like Apollo 13) then things being "not realistic" is simply not a valid criticism. Batman V Superman was a terrible movie, but not because it had unrealistic superheros. It was filled with plot holes, bad writing and bad acting, and terrible CGI.

Here's my first large space station, only just completed after being built over a span of ten irl months. It was built in 100% stock, hardcore career (no flight resets) using realistically sized rockets. Specs: Parts: 251 Mass: 111.8 tons (no fuel or asteroids added) Size: 20.9X29.4X45.2 Cost: $284,000 (more than $2 mil to put into orbit) Orbit: 200x200km, equatorial Frames while in physics range: <2