Search the Community

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2016/03/hey-bill-nye-please-stop-talking.html I have to disagree with this individual and agree in part (small) with Nye, I think you can get instantaneous communication, the problems are this Particle A is split into Particles BC at which point they are entangled. ParticleA (plural;A[]) is split into serially into particles BC and set into a linear array B[] and C[] B[] and C[] are carried off into some far off part of the galaxy. According to quantum entanglement if the series B[] is determined, then C[] is also known no matter the distance as soon as C is examined. So the current studies I have seen is that B[] can be determined (resolved and semi-randomly forced - meaning that some of the time the observer can force the outcome of B, we will call this array B[~] therefore A[] -> A[x~] where x is the opposite of the state of B. The problem then arises in the space-time relationship. If ship b and c travel to opposing ends of the galaxy their spacetime hypergeometry begins to start diverging (and not only this but we cannot see them and we cannot realize the differences in warping). We have tested relationships of a few kilometers, communication seems to work, but anything beyond that distance and entangled particles become unstable, they don't last. For the scheme above to work the particles are trapped in state of non-interaction, but the problem is that to accelerate, carried some place, and decelerate the particles are interacting and therefore one or the other will be resolved sooner or later. The second problem is that for b to communicate with c is that b and c have to have a common ancestor and a shared devotee that protects their non-state. That means that communication requires a preparative process, but not only that, meaningful resolution may require some simultaneous observation. Suppose this scenario we fix these problems. We send out a colonization ship that wakes in say 10000 years, far beyond rf range, and in that ship there is a box, and in the box there is a matrix of say 1000 B[] and in each B[] there are a million B So then A knows when the ship arrives and settles, careful estimates of the space time geometry are assessed, the were probes sent from time to time from both parties to calibrate any unknown irregularities that have occurred. B[]1 is configured and gets a 30% bias, which means each bit needs to be repeated 10 times, with a parity bit to check for errors, thats 90B per byte of information. So the first message can be 10,000bytes long. The last sentence in the array is how long until the next message is sent, its repeated several times so that any nonsense is weeded out. A[]1 is then resolved and received. It now knows when to open A[]2. It also knows that if it wants to send a message back it has to before B[]2 is sent, because once B[]2 begins resolving its either set or not, As B[]2 is being programmed, the programmers realize it is set, so they read that message and then program B[]3 instead, and back and forth in this way communicating. This is not a declaration that the problems of communication can be fixed, but if they are fixed, this is how quantum entangled communication might work. In the same comoving reference frame resolving simultaneity is not that difficult because there is no relative vector differences, but once the comoving references start changing. If B and C need to be observed simultaneously for communication to work B being set and C being read, then communication is a highly improbable event as spacetime diverges.