Gavin McStine

Perhaps different parts would have different costs for referbishing it. For example an engine might just need a tune up, but a fuel tank will need more fuel, which might be the higher cost over the metal tank.

I would like more runway options, but you need to buy them, something like a launch rail would need to be researched before a buy option becomes available.

I think you should have to return, its kinda like seasons but you can't wait for it to change as you'll run out of food. Yes i know your kerbs will live for ever. But it kinda makes sense without having to code all that.

Yes it will make more but smaller debris, right now they can make the debris small enough to not cause any damage to ships hulls/stations/satellites, the only thing that is really damaged is solar panels, which are made larger because they are expecting to lose some solar cells(the smaller parts to solar panels) to debris. Right now they are just clicking a button with no cost, I'm just asking that there should be some cost for it. And no, missiles are used right now to take down old large debris that are not designed to break apart.

Things on Kerbal should be recovered at a very small cost. Fuel, personnel and what not. But when it comes to space junk there should be a higher cost for some type of missile. The missile is not shown, it auto hits and destroys its target and only its target(no area effect) With prices for within orbit of Kerbal, in orbit of sun, in orbit/landed on another planet. I'm reminded by NASAs having to track space debris and some stations/satellite having to avoid debris fields.