ABanimationLtd

Indeed, I am not overly familiar with vectors, at least not to the level of complexity that's being used here. I suppose the problem comes with bridging the gap between physics and computing, and translating some of these equations into computer code. This is why I'm not simulating 2D space - the last time I tried that, most of even the most basic equations stopped working, like v = sqrt(GM(2/r - 1/a)). Still not entirely sure why. However, I could try using actual 2D space with a co-ordinate system again if you think it'll work, since I have the code for it stored elsewhere. I could then start using vectors properly, but yes, a lot of it would need explaining in simpler terms. I believe a lot of my problems came from the fact that I was simulating the actual force of gravity on my object and just letting it go from there - leaving me with no way of accurately figuring out the apoapsis, periapsis, period and so on. So, I would rather avoid using 2D space and vectors if possible but if there is no other way I should be able to get it set up.

This doesn't really make much sense to me. To clarify: I start with my apoapsis, periapsis, distance and mu values; from there I find the semi-major axis, orbital velocity, orbital energy, theta, and radial velocity, which then increments the total distance. When it reaches apoapsis, a boolean changes from true to false so that its movement reverses, and the opposite occurs at periapsis. I'm not actually simulating any kind of 2D space or vectors. The only indicator of where I am in the orbit is theta. So, I need a way of doing this without vectors. If I'm missing something really obvious and am being really stupid, please explain to me what I should be doing

So I'm working on a programming project which involves simulating some 2D orbital mechanics. I've got everything set up running smoothly for a stable orbit, but now I'd like to be able to change the orbital velocity at any point and for the program to calculate what would then happen to the apoapsis, periapsis, semi-major axis and so on. So let's say I'm orbiting at 2000m/s, and I accelerate to 2100m/s, what would I need to do to find out what my new apoapsis and periapsis are? I'm assuming I'll need the theta angle, and I can calculate that quite easily already. Any equation(s) I should try using?

Greetings. I am Adam, a 16-year-old from Britain. I've owned KSP since December 2012, but never really got involved in the community. Now that I've just finished school, I should have a lot more time on my hands, which is why I'm here. I have a few hobbies, which in increasing order of eccentricity are: Gaming (mainly Minecraft and KSP), Programming, YouTube (YouTubing?), and Micronationalism (Just google it). -H.I.M. Adamus Primus Imperator