Golakka

Currently testing a hydrofoil style underbelly to see if that solves the problem

I was thinking of using a VERY heavy RCS system and maybe radial mount parachutes, Im currently testing this idea with my Arkbird. Oh and the front half of the cockpit is on its way into deep space with fuel to spare

I highly doubt i could mount more than 3 in a line, let alone get airborne..... This is if the aircraft even GETS to the water, if it can even LAND in the water..... ALSO! Development Screenshots! Underbelly shot showing the reinforcement and fuel lines. Above shot showing the massive/horrofying engines Head on shot to scare the living crap out of you. Results of a disasterous test flight have given me a brilliant idea Suggestions on how to avoid disintegration when i hit the water are much appreciated Oh and here is the reference image im using for scale. I feel the engine pods are too large

I dont have any missiles aside from a few small SRBs i could use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moskit Missiles that the Lun class carried Oh and the russian government is planning to have more Lun class built

if i can find a way to mount 6x5ton missiles at an angle yet still be able to take off

Update on 'Object 392' Object 392 will be a large ground effect vheicle in the style of the Lun-class ekranoplan (AKA Caspian Sea monster) At this early stage i can confirm this will be about the height of the launch tower and easily the most powerful and complex machine ive ever attempted.

Well there goes the theory 'If it looks like it will fly, it probably will' I know of a 30 story block of flats near me that looks like it could fly better Ill need to download this and give it a bash. Very interesting design however, I cant wait to see the rest of the TA- Series. The engine pods remind me of some of the old soviet ekranoplan designs. Oh my good God. IDEA!

Sounds good!

Ive got an idea! We agree that the designs look similar out of coincidence and we can stop bumping our posts/spamming

Maybe im just good 8) The way you said it, It sounded like only you could possibly come up with that idea. Updating performance stats as we speak.

To be honest, Aside from the engines i cant see any resemblance as 'Object 421' is a Triplane

Cant say ive seen it before. Implying im stealing peoples ideas now ?? O_O And the Object names are only palceholders to be honest.

Just a design im working on for Object 421

Yeah, im trying to get away from that but please remember, ive only been playing KSP for a week or two.

Not to mention i have hardly any machines justnow, I intend to live up to my bold claims of size and range