Khazuar

Hi, I've been playing KSP since early Beta and I liked all the improvements made to the game (and many of the mods made by users) very much. As a software engineer myself and experienced with C# I always thought about developing a mod myself, but I never had a good idea what to do. Here I'd like to propose one I had recently: I had a spaceplane that I flew several times already and that has proven very reliable over time. With the unlocking of new parts or the detecting of flaws in the original design that came up in certain scenarios I updated the original design a few times and then had to apply the same changes to all my cargo and passenger variants, littering my craft-catalog with many versions of variants of the same craft. I thought something like "I would love to have git to propagate my changes to my base vehicle to the derived ones" and came up with the following plan: Every saved craft get's a version number attached to it. Whenever a craft gets changed in the VAB or SPH and saved again, you can create either a new version of the craft or create a derived craft (like one with additional fuel tanks / passenger modules ...). Derived vessels would point to their base vessels including the version they're based on. *Old* versions of a craft get hidden in the vessel catalog, so they don't litter everything up. Derived vessels could get in an collapsible indented list underneath their base vessel. Once a base vessel gets updated (so, a new craft-file with higher version number gets stored than the version a derived vessel is based upon) the derived vessel can be *rebased* and a new version of the derived vessel gets stored. Vessels in KSP are trees, starting from a root node (the root part), with all the connected parts as child-nodes. It should be easy to comprise a diff between two versions of a vessel and apply that to a derived vessel. Possible conflicts would arise if in the base vessel something got attached where also the derived vessel attached something. Those conflicts would need to be manually resolved by the player, choosing either of the variants and/or fixing manually. What do you think of that idea? Would you consider it useful to have or am I the only one building five generations of the same ship, improving it every time?

Hi, I registered here because I searched the web and this forum for any hints towards my issue. I use a modded install of KSP 0.90 32-bit on Windows including: -DeadlyReentry -DistantObject -Firespitter (dll only) -KAS -Procedural Fairings -RemoteTech -Kerbal Alarm Clock All mods are up to date and seem to run well with KSP 0.90. About my issue: From time to time, when I start the game and want to go to the tracking-station to oversee the progress of my various missions (90+ including all those satellites from RemoteTech) the game just shows the loading screen (turns black and shows the "rotating planets in the down right corner") and freezes after a fraction of a second (means the blackness wont go away, to "loading planets" stop spinning). The game wont come back after that but wont die either, but will remain in this state indefinitely. When I restart the game and click on the VAB, the SPH or any other building, everything's fine. I can even launch vessels and look at the map-view from there (that's what I do currently instead of using the Tracking Station). No other problems. But the Tracking Station wont load, no matter what I do. Other savegames seems to work fine. So when I start another game, no issues there. When I load an older quicksafe on my "broken" game, everything's fine. When I had this issue before, I just reverted a week of progress and could play again, but now I am struck for the second time and not willing to give up my successes again. Any ideas on this? Could it be related to the mods I installed? Am I having too much spacecrafts active? Can I get any additional infos about my error somehow? It does not seem like it created an errorlog like it would do when the game "just crashed". Thanks! log: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lzxayy62xnw2hw4/output_log.txt?dl=0