-
Posts
394 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Article Comments posted by PocketBrotector
-
-
49 minutes ago, Zhetaan said:
That being said, I have not looked too deeply into the legacy system, and so if it turns out that EVA propellant has always been treated as though it had an assumed 5 kg/unit density (whether or not the mass was actually accounted), then I suppose my surprise is borne of ignorance.
Nah it was massless before. The new system is definitely an improvement.
Fair point about the density, though I don’t think we’d get realism or consistency regardless... real-world MMUs provided 25 m/s of dv using cold nitrogen gas, while the ones in KSP gave upwards of 600 m/s using their magical propellant.
I don’t know if the new EVA propellant has an assigned volume value, but if it’s 5L/unit like the other stock fuels then I don’t know where the backpack has room to store 25L of it... best not to look too hard under the hood.
1.11: Weighing in on some changes
in Developer Articles
Posted
I think that this was an intended feature in the extreme early days, which is why command pods contain an amount of monopropellant too small to be useful for docking. I don't remember that it was ever implemented in stock, though.