Alguien
-
Posts
153 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Alguien
-
-
With the rewritting the engine maybe we can actually have ships accelerating when out of focus, so solar sails won't be that bad of a idea.
-
- Make Kerbin actually lively, cities with lights at night, kerbals walking around and cars. Make it a planet with a real kerbal civilization and not just the KSC
- Full Kerbin system. ot was going to be similar to our own but it was never completed (officialy) that way in 1, also a real asteroid belt instead of just random ones
- Ship interiors where the kerbal move around doing stuff, make them lively instead of just seating in a chair 24/7
- More anomalities, maybe with some storylines with them
- Give the ground crew some love, make them characters, small window cinematics celebrating launches or you can be in the command room when iva with probes.
- Weather effects
Many of them are not really gameplay changing, but I feel giving some atmosphere (ok maybe not in the Mun) to the game is also important. -
While unfortunate that KSP launched while it was still in beta (sorry devs, but it did)
I actually think KSP launched while in alpha since they were still adding features (in a half-way manner) even for 1.00, doesn't really change much, in both cases is pretty clear release was as rushed as a EA or Activision game
-
and it had nothing to do with the development of 1.0.3, which they - like the doctor and his "good news", implied was forthcoming.
Ohohohoho i won't be so sure.
As much as the FAQ claims it has speeded up the process and we have be always at war with Eurasia, i find it pretty clear the real decision to force the U5 upgrade into 1.0.3 (which was original supose to be bug and memory leaks fixing) and the delays on it is because of this in the first place.
-
I do hope that most people realised that Squad would never do this sort of a thing
Just like Squad will never do an april fool joke in march?
-
This was awesome. The most awesome part about it: The amount of dumb displayed by most of the previous posters in this thread. For a bunch of self proclaimed "smart" people, you fell for it hook line and sinker.
Ok i will explain a little detail to you and hopefully to Kasper, since you both seem to have a colored high horse so up your read end you can't see it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day
April Fools' Day (sometimes called April Fool's Day or All Fools' Day) is celebrated every year on the first day of April as a day when people play practical jokes and hoaxes on each other.Now, what day it is?
PROTIP:
Is not April 1
but the post said the update will...april fool jokes are on APRIL 1, NOT TWO WEEKS EARLY, MESS UP AND THEN TRYING TO DO DAMAGE CONTROL ABOUT BEING A "EARLY" "APRIL" "FOOL" "JOKE"
You dumbass
-
Sick, cruel, terrible joke if it is a joke.
jokes are suppose to be funny
-
"When did everyone lose their critical thinking abilities? This is the most obvious April Fool's joke I've EVER seen. And I really mean that."
Probably because people with critical thinking abilities know april fools jokes are suppose to happen april 1
Not March 20
Maybe you should be telling Squad about critical thinking, because they cleary have no idea what it means
-
you're not required to pay to use the forum, only to access certain feature
But i AM requiered to pay to get mods from the official forums because the threads are older that three months
And not actually a cheap price, actually having to pay a similar price as KSP without disccount
and as a bonus, you'll support modders, YouTubers and people like me'Youtubes get money from youtube
mods can put donation buttons in their threads
And i rather pay EA that people like you, at least they actually make games
-
text
Exactly, i don't know why he loves and pushes it so much, hell even the organization is a mess, i don't know how people can use so much. It doesn't help the voting system can easily be used for mobs to censor criticism they don't like, unless you are some kind of "Elite" user and the community takes everything you say as a Holy word
Wait, what do you mean you aren't talking about reddit?
-
Really? REALLY? So they are asking twitter what they want to see here on the Forum instead of asking the Forum?
Is also in the official Facebook, but so far as i know, nada on the forums
https://www.facebook.com/kerbalspaceprogram/posts/938699566149268
-
Squad went to Reddit to get the feedback on the tutorials - not the other way around.
Can you point me where is Squad asking this:
https://twitter.com/KerbalSpaceP/status/565329492306972672
Or is the Daily kerbal not intended for the forum users either?
-
No, you're completely misrepresenting what I said: in this particular case we chose to go to Reddit. That does not mean that only Reddit provides information we use: these forums are often a great source of information, and sometimes we analyze data from social media.
I am not misrepresenting anything, i am talking from experience.
I know people have been asking for better tutorials for years, even before career and it was like the input entered right through Max ear and left Maps other ear. But we are talking about a Producer who thinks Girlbals are more important that finishing IVAs
Then Reddit ask for the same thing AND BAM PRIORITY.
One thing is doing AMAs, other is asking for input that impacts the game in reddit only and acting like is a small deal when the fallout hits you.
Actions speak louder than words, if you don't want the forums to believe that then better start working.
-
I honestly think that the current response to the Reddit being mentioned in the dev notes is somewhat over-the-top. As mentioned previously in this thread Reddit lends itself perfectly to get the information Maxmaps was after: not only does Reddit's format of up- and downvoting mean that the most popular answers float to the top where they can be quickly looked over, Reddit also attracts more 'new' players who haven't gotten much experience in KSP yet and can therefore share what problems they're running into. We're very much aware of the spread of the KSP community and therefore made a choice to ask this particular question on Reddit.
So short version: If you want your input to be read/listen, post it in Reddit.
-
That's only one interpretation. Reddit's voting system lends itself well to figuring out what's popular, making it a good place to put out that question.
What other interpretation? They literally said "we asked reddit, and this is what the community decided" Newflash, reddit is not the whole KSP community.
Squad also has done surveys here in the past about the community and merchandising. So its not reddit's voting system either.
The whole point of the forums AND devnotes should be the fanbase having a "archive" where they can see and read the ingame info. NOT having to go around fishing in multiple sites like Squad is playing favorites or trying to hide something.
-
I've been a KSP player and part of the community since December 2012
Read the devnotes, Squad left it very clear: You are not a redditor then you are not part of the comunity.
-
Stock aerodynamics has been at the top of the list of things the player community are annoyed about for a long time. Backwards compatibility would help to preserve the flying pancakes and stupid designs that we all want to see the end of. Few tears will be shed for the demise of such designs.
With Harv edit about using the old stock planes designed for the old broken aerodynamics as a "control", i fear the changes are going to be fairly minimal and stupid designs like a cube will still be able to fly as good (or even better) that aerodynamic planes
And what do you have against the V-173?
-
While the old parts have a nostalgic charm, i am not sure if the will be up to the today expected quality from the game, but opinions
i do think Squad picked the worst way to make the whole progression in general, upgrading buildings is totally unattached to the techtree, and upgrading individuality while it helps "customize the experience" it can create situations when you have a Tier3 next to a Tier 1 building with all the aestetic class it comes with. I think a better solution would be Tier 1->small part of the techtree with T1 parts->T2->it upgrades the whole KSC and T1 parts to T2->T2 tree->T3 upgrade for KSC/Parts->Final part of the techtree, but again, opinions
also my "favorite" parts of the new buildings is Tier 2, particulary the tracking station (which has absolute NOTHING to do with the other parts of the tier and is a Tier 3 touched up "in building") and the mindblowing number of doors per building (do they really need up to 6 doors per side?)
-
I don't think the farm was bad in terms of concept to be honest, it was more execution.
The execution problems don't stop just at how the assets were all over the place
the rocket/plane parts also crash with the aestetic, is one thing having "primitive" rockets like goddard style and biplanes build in a farm, but the KSP part are Saturn V like, that isn't just stuff from a farm
-
Yes I do know that, and it isn't isolated to just one of them but it was definitely not originated in America, and the "Classic American Red Barn" is not a thing. European was the correct term and what I said is correct, your facetiousness needs a history lesson.
Nobody said red colored farms were invented by americans, just like the apple pie or the statue of liberty, all of them came from Europe but are now associated with America thanks to pop culture.
And for your other post, yes, there are more countries with space programs, some of them do more than NASA does this days, but guess what, if you open KSP you will notice how heavily based is in NASA, not ESA, not CNSA, not CCCP/ROSCOSMOS, not JAXA.
So apply yourself.
-
I am not even going to repeat what others said about the quality of the models and textures.
Weren't your guys claiming Kerbals were pretty good at engineering and building instead of being ORKZ WITHOUT WAAAAGH? Because i see this buildings and other than the bad quality of it, they just scream Ork/ghetto.
They don't fit the game (ok i will give you the trailer park), IF the player started with old begining of the century rockets then yes, a barn/old factory would work fine, but we dont, as we can see with your techtree which has the player start with 60s level technology for rockets
IS NOT EVEN A CLASSIC RED AMERICAN BARN WITH A TOWER SILO, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
-
And that's kinda where the crux of the argument is here. People who are okay with the idea of the Kerbals being the ones piloting don't really seem to mind the fact that they get better at steering and overall become more efficient pilots. People who see themselves as the pilot don't like the idea of getting extra bonuses when they are already performing at what they consider to be peak capacity.
Is not that black and white. Some people are fine with better steering but not engines being more efficient because the kerbal has a medal for example.
I will be honest, the core of the idea is decent, how your guys were planning in implement it wasn't
Personally, instead of taking everything to Kerbonauts, why not dividing it between three kerbal groups?
The K-Suits, who get experience as you finish contracts and get contract related (extra pay, more time to complete, bigger margen of error,etc) bonus
The Engineers, who get experience for assembling and recovering the rocket, and obviously get the bonus to part efficiency (as opposed to your idea of Jeb hitting the pedal harder makes the rocket going magically faster)
And the Kerbonauts themselves, who get bonus to other stuff like extra science per sample, less electricity cost/extra bonus for sending data, able to repair more types of parts (i can partially undertand addint steering here)
And to expand it even more, contracts where companies ask you for your top K-Suit, engis or Kerbonauts for rewards, do you accept the B9 Aerospace request of your Engi team A? Or you decline in favor of that extra puff they give for your Mun mission?
This solves the whole logic problem and expands that the KSP is more than just Jeb, Bob and Bill
Edit: This is also a pretty good example of the divide between the playerbase between seeing the game as a simulator or a game.Arcade, the word is arcade, not "game", simulators are still games.
-
Honestly, it sounds like is part of the "kerbals are able to fly your ships" but Squad for some reason only gods know why, decided to add the bonus first and then they will add the piloting "eventually"
Is honestly the only way i can see it making some sort of sense, sort of
-
Yep. But seeing in what direction this game drifts: explosions, devs building flat rockets, people arguing that incorrect Isp calculation is actually a feature - somehow I'm not surprised.
Is funny because reworked aerodynamics is something i actually see be worth hype as much as Squad pushed for building destruction
Well, more sad than funny honestly, with Rows comment is clear Squad takes priority over the game having explosions than actually fixing broken stuff
Not to mention for a space game, Squad hasn't added anything pass Kerbin SoI in ages, even asteroid only cross Kerbin Soi!
Couple of concerns
in Prelaunch KSP2 Discussion
Posted
Or could be one of the reasons we are getting KSP2 is because building a code that allows multiplayer is much more effective that patch it into a decade old game like the original squad team wanted to do.
Besides, is called the space race for a reason.