Jump to content

Kerbrian

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kerbrian

  1. On 17/07/2017 at 5:24 PM, Krakatoa said:

    In vacuum, there are loads of engines that do better.  An equivalent mass of fuel for a nuclear engine and a stock LFO engine will have the nuclear engine going much farther.  Situations can still call for a LFO engine, like if adding the nuclear engine would double the mass of the whole vehicle, but yeah, the higher ISP and decent amount of thrust means their dV in vacuum is massive.

    Thanks Krakatoa, I've made a lot of test and it seems i'm still can't understand the behavior of the Delta-V. Why my lv-909 (LF+Ox) have a better Dv than my NV-GX Emancipator (LH2) with a little fuel tank when it's the opposite with Very large Tanks ? (NB: for the larger tank i put 8xLV909 and 8xNVGX. With only one engine, the results are way more different LV909=7448 and NVGX=39986 :confused:)

    vsfmNhs.png

  2. On 27/10/2016 at 10:58 PM, SuicidalInsanity said:

    @Kerbrian: I'm going to need more information than that; without the name of mod you're using for info displays and/or an output_log, I can't help you.

    @Ampcat: Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Yes, that is certainly something that will need to be fixed.

    Sorry, I'm using Kerbal Engineer Redux. I tried multiple configurations :

    Stock engine on stockalike bicoupler = no infos

    Stockalike engine on stock tank = no infos

    stock engine on stock tank = infos

×
×
  • Create New...