-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
0 NeutralRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
The latest Kopernicus (1.7.0-1) seems to be taking issue with TBG. Version # update perhaps?
- 184 replies
-
- stock visual enhancement
- research bodies
- (and 3 more)
-
Thanks for the quick reply. Seeds: 5628783, 563593, 420454, 2755295, 8983622, 47, 589392, 42424242, 33369991, and generally lots of random number tapping. Outside of the Moon issue (and the really low asteroid counts, though I'm guessing this is more due to memory concerns than being unrealistic) everything is great, I especially like the ability to add content from planet packs. I'm gonna test if my current cludge of using the previous Galaxy gen with the current files is a viable temporary fix. Update: Kopernicus seems to be screaming bloody murder at the results of my experiment, so it looks like I'll go moonless for a while.
- 184 replies
-
- stock visual enhancement
- research bodies
- (and 3 more)
-
v0.3.1.3.1b "Bon Jovi 86" Your question go me thinking, so I pulled up the previous version's galaxy generators bits and copied them over the current one. Presto! Moons are generated. Now to test if I just made a game breaking galaxy with my mad science.
- 184 replies
-
- stock visual enhancement
- research bodies
- (and 3 more)
-
By chance is anyone else having an issue generating moons using the Galaxy Gen? No matter what I input I'm getting a constant 0 moons count at the end
- 184 replies
-
- stock visual enhancement
- research bodies
- (and 3 more)
-
A little clarification may be needed. TBG (0.3.5f) on my game runs smoothly. No nuclear lightocalypse since I replaced MM 3.0 (see previous posts). I was trying to assist Nubees with their dilemma thinking it may have been the same as I had back before my MM fix. From other threads it seems to be mostly a Kopernicus issue. Could be my malfunctioning Module Manager was messing maliciously with Kopernicus? In any event, that was my fix. Glad to see no one else has had the same issue.
- 977 replies
-
- kerbal space program
- kopernicus
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Huh, I'm rather curious as to what it might be then. I've got almost every visual enhancement mod available installed (EVE, OPM with OPMVO, SVT, SVE, Planetshine, Windowshine, Distant object enhance, Nebula decals) so I can say it wouldn't be any of them that's cranking your lighting dial to 11. You could go with the tried and true removing of every mod folder except for TBG then bringing them back in batches until the lights get screwy.
- 977 replies
-
- kerbal space program
- kopernicus
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
TastyMango changed their profile photo
-
Had the same problem. Turns out it was the butler (module manager 3.0.0) all along! Module manager 2.8.1 seems to set things right.
- 977 replies
-
- kerbal space program
- kopernicus
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[1.8.1] Kerbal Konstructs - 1.8.1.15 - 15.Dec.2019
TastyMango replied to Ger_space's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Gave that a go and set the range to 9 Km. I'm still getting the "there are no craft in range" from the hanger (I guess I should specify these are the 2 hangars added to the KSC as part of the Kerbin-Side multi pack) despite being pressed up against the hangar door Edit: Problem solved. Apparently my Kerbal has to exit the craft and ring the doorbell. Drive-through diners on Kerbin must be awful Thanks Ger_Space! -
[1.8.1] Kerbal Konstructs - 1.8.1.15 - 15.Dec.2019
TastyMango replied to Ger_space's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Is anyone else having problems with their hangers? I'm close enough to dent the door and still it's listing me as too far away. Fuel depots and other structures seem to work within reasonable proximity.