Johnnyc

You should read what if? by Randall Munroe It's full of absurd questions and scientific answers. What would happen if you swam in a nuclear cooling pool? You'd be fine if you didn't touch a fuel rod.

Hi guys, I just thought I would share a little theory/though experiment. It pulls from a lot of other theories and I wouldn’t be surprised if this same idea has already been proposed. Please enjoy and discuss. This little theory is based on a few points · Black holes are a point with huge mass but no matter · On the other end of a black hole there are theoretical white holes that are a point with no mass that spews matter forth · The universe is expanding at an accelerated rate-speeding toward the heat death · In the final stages of the heat death of the universe matter will cease to exist and a low energy radiation will persist · Black holes emit hawking radiation-less when they are large but more and more he saller they get So my theory is that in every black hole in our universe there is a self-contained, and smaller in mass, universe. The big bang for these smaller universes is really a theoretical white hole and what we call our big bag is a white hole connected to a black hole in a much more massive universe than ours. As a smaller universe accelerates toward its heat death, more and more of it is composed of radiation. This is the hawking radiation emitted by black holes. Hawking radiation increases as a black hole nears its life because the smaller universe is accelerating to its heat death. This would mean that our universe has spawned ?billions-quintillions? Of smaller self-contained universes. Each of these is younger and will die before our universe. In turn, our universe is just one of the ?billions-quintillions? Of self-contained universes in our parent universe. We liv in a younger universe than that of the parent and will succumb to heat death before it can. In this way we can start with a universe of a given mass and spawn an unimaginable number of smaller universes in generations down to the point that the youngest cannot support creating a black hole of its own.

Thanks for the response guys. I just thought it would be interesting/ironic if, say we do the un doable and we break the laws of physics and we are rewarded with compression into a singularity.

This is my first post here but I've been reading this subforum for about a week. I was reading a thread that gave me a few ideas/questions. My questions are set up with quotes from the link belowhttp://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/146502-black-holes-spinning-faster-than-light/Tullius Aug 25 2016"In special relativity, the energy of an object is expressed as E = gamma*m*c^2 , where gamma depends on the speed (and increases to infinity, if the speed of the object approaches the speed of light), m is the mass of the object (in the classical sense) and c the speed of light.Any particle that orbits a black hole orbits at a ridiculously high speed, which means that it has a ridiculously high energy.The "relativistic mass" is defined as M = gamma*m. The advantage of this notion is that the famous E = M*c^2 holds also for moving particles and in general it simplifies the formulas. However, M is some kind of mass that depends on the speed of the particle in the reference frame of the observer"Kerbiloid Aug 25 2016"Does it mean that any particle, orbiting a blackhole, when reaching the event horizon gets infinity mass for an outside observer?"Pb666 Aug 25 2016"When they pass the event horizon, from our perspective universe, the particle ceases to exist and become part of the singularity."MeIf we one day build a ship capable of hitting the speed of light, it would reach infinite relitavistic mass. Would that ship then become a singularity? Is it possible the speed of light is only a limit because anything moving faster transforms into a black hole?