Jump to content

Clark Griswold

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clark Griswold

  1. Valid but I think there is value in having a manned airship (more science performed, technology development, operational experience, etc...) in the HAVOC proposal. IMO, HAVOC and specifically the development of the transfer vehicles and ideally a system of shuttling continuously vehicles between Venus - Earth - Mars is viable crawl-walk-run strategy for inner solar system exploration. First mission(s) to Venus for tele-robotic sample collection and concept development (atmospheric entry would be awesome but not necessary) then leverage that experience for Mars orbital / Martian moon landing missions, building infrastructure (orbital & surface) for a landing in the mid 2030's during these missions in the 2020's. http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a17552/phobos-landing/
  2. Just saw the HAVOC video and one thing I didn't see pitched in the concept that seemed logical was a surface soil / atmosphere collection via unmanned system and retrieval to the floating manned station - is this remotely feasible?
×
×
  • Create New...