Jump to content

TaRebelSheep

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TaRebelSheep

  1. TaRebelSheep
    Unfortunately @CrazyJebGuy is no longer very active on this thread, however I can get the message across to him.
  2. TaRebelSheep
    You won't see rocket engines, those aren't allowed except for cosmetic purposes i guess?
  3. TaRebelSheep
    I have consulted with @CrazyJebGuy and he agrees that 16 sounds good for the size 1.5 (1.875m) passenger cabin. In addition, the half size MK1 cabin counts as 4 passengers.
  4. TaRebelSheep
    Ah yes, I've been looking forward to that review, I cooked that plane up in about ten minutes.
  5. TaRebelSheep
    @tonimark your album link is broken.
  6. TaRebelSheep
    Two of my planes have been reviewed but have not been listed on the original post: the C5 "RePurpose" on page 4, and the FA5T-W4 on page 10 Also, are you on the new thread in terms of reviewing planes yet?
  7. TaRebelSheep
    I just realised that there is a typo in the original post that I can't believe no-one has noticed yet. It says " takeoff speed may be higher that 80 m/s"
  8. TaRebelSheep
    What about the new mk3S1.5 parts from the AP+ update? There are no passenger modules that fit that size, so can we downscale a mk3 cabin and say it holds as much as a normal mk1 crew cabin?
  9. TaRebelSheep
    Juno engines are the smallest engine, however they are not the most efficient engine. they are fine for a small plane though.
  10. TaRebelSheep
    I've seen designs incorporating parachutes as wings, and there's nothing in the rules that says fixed wings are a requirement, so I say yes, as long as you can find kerbals willing to be wings, seeing as we can't remove them from the kerbal and attach them to a plane for whatever reason.
  11. TaRebelSheep
    C'mon guys let's keep it sane and sensible.
  12. TaRebelSheep
    This thread is now defunct, please use the new forum thread here:
  13. TaRebelSheep
    Here's the download link, for anyone who doesn't want to go to the thread: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/g45l0djvbmypl3e/AABZ033reYyTd_6xV17txTR3a?dl=0 It's the Airplanes Plus one. Just stick the .cfg in your gamedata folder
  14. TaRebelSheep
    Is a Tweakscale Compatibility Patch allowed? all it does is let me tweakscale AP+ parts.
  15. TaRebelSheep
    Range: 4100m. I think you mean km?
  16. TaRebelSheep
    I don't think you can call the challenge submission list "Way out of date" anymore.
  17. TaRebelSheep
    https://kerbalx.com/TaRebelSheep/Aeris-3A-KC-challenge Ignore the crashed into VAB message, that happened after the landing. I swear, I reached 80000m ish but i reloaded a quicksave and the flight results don't carry over. Score: 2.77
  18. TaRebelSheep
    I have realised that with whiplashes, getting to space is surprisingly easy. (not cheap though)
  19. TaRebelSheep
    Indeed, this looks like fun. Time to pull out the shock cone intakes.
  20. TaRebelSheep
    As long as it doesn't call upon the Kraken, it sounds interesting.
  21. TaRebelSheep
    Seems interesting, can it rotate on the joint so larger planes can be turned in tight circles? Also a download link, if you want to share the craft file.
  22. TaRebelSheep
    If you aren't aware, all submissions should be entered to the new thread:
  23. TaRebelSheep
    Not right now, I'm not the best at stock props, although I might have an interesting design that won't look like a normal plane, that's for sure!
  24. TaRebelSheep
    Ok, so it really is a lot like the Regional Jet Challenge, just with stock electric props.
  25. TaRebelSheep
    So price is no issue?
×
×
  • Create New...