dogon11

Train cannons! How? I got the game from my old school\'s book sale, actually... I made a sky-rail network with the super-fast trains, so high that aircraft flew through it and under it during landing.

Indeed it is. I should mount a search for the disk, as you mentioning it makes me want to play it.

.16s pretty new for me, so I\'m gonna try my hand at an orbital 'rest stop', orbiting the mun, carrying extra fuel for vessels that need to top up before returning to Kerbin. Or you could use it to pop your unintended return vessel\'s crew into, and have them wait for the ferry home. Don\'t schedule me... okay, do schedule me, as if I wait, I\'ll lose interest in designing it. I repeat, that\'s a go for the Crew and Rocket Assessment Pod, or the C.R.A.P. 1.

Here\'s my current machine, my laptop... Yes I love Doctor Who. Also, I NEED for my icons to be in a pile directed off to the left. Any other way and I go crazy. NEEDS to be on the left. No other way possible, and it\'s not because of the background, the background came after the icon organization.

The Leo-Baker Launch Vehicle System is a reliable, three-man rocket that can orbit in LKO. It\'s a three-stage rocket, with the first being four parallel boosters, the second the core booster, and the third the upper booster. No solid rocket boosters are used on the entire vehicle. The capsule returns with two side-mounted parachutes, since the ASAS and RCS tank are mounted above the capsule, as an orbital science and equipment module, with the front of the ASAS acting as a dummy docking ring. That dummy ring needs to be exposed, so an ejectable cap is placed on top of it. The service module has a one-depth large tank, with three radial engines for propulsion in orbit. The entire craft has eight RCS thruster blocks, and there are plenty of ladders around the ship. Demo album: http://imgur.com/a/F7MSO#0 Craft is attached. Note: The Leo is the capsule/service/orbital modules, the Baker is the launch vehicle.

What\'s with the tri-coupler? Also, none of my mun rockets work... except for the extremely efficient. That\'s a good thing, reducing waste and all.

Which fuel? The airplane fuel, or the rocket uel?

Possibly more fuel.

I loved FSX, but it stopped working after a week. I think it was mix up, because I had downloaded the demo before buying, and I didn\'t delete it, so whenever I tried booting up the full game, it said 'please purchase the full game to continue playing'. That made me sad, especially because I liked the gliders.

9.9/10 for not being an F-35.

573) When you realize that your first stage needs RCS and lander legs to get off the pad without blowing up.

I do that, but it\'s when I\'m adjusting my view for flight, not screenshots.

Does that explain why my solar space station lost one of it\'s four sid-mounted engines, making it impossible to control?

571) When your plane hasn\'t taken off AFTER the end of the runway, and the ocean is coming up fast. (shouldn\'t this go in the games subforum?)

You can do it on the date Apollo11 left the lunar surface... if it\'s ready.

One thing I\'d like to see is an effecient three-stage-or-less orbital rocket for LKO observation.

Trying the RCS, only reaching ~150. Is that normal?

And the lowest I could get it... 1264 USD. I could get it farther down without the quiet fan mounts and quiet fan units.

It pisses me off due to reminding me of 95% of idiots on Facebook.

It\'s liquid cooled.

Changed thrust to 180, optimal airflow to 20, intake power to 225, and minimal airflow to 2. Flew at 10 degrees nose up, aircraft reached max altitude of 26km.

Try maximum intake power. That might help.

It appears that we\'ll need RCS for such high altitude flight.

I\'m actually looking to use this engine in a MiG-25 recreation. 2 should put it at 23km, which is perfect.

Quite possibly. I\'m going to retry with airflow of 2.