Jump to content

Ziggy Kerman

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ziggy Kerman

  1. 12 minutes ago, HansonKerman said:

    had

    [michael had]

    a

    [michael had a]

    On 5/16/2020 at 5:30 PM, Fraston said:

    I bet there will be some person in the future that will look back through every page of this thread if we complete our goal to see what odds and ends we fill up the pages with.

    Well
    I'll be that person, might as well start at 300 and visit every day until we hit 1000

  2. Well, I apparently made a little thingy, no name, just this:
    After the war not to be named, life is never new, nor old, perpetual presence.

    A headstone in a battle field said,
    "My death was noble, yet only in the eyes of the reaper and devil,"

    During a funerals, as the bells tolled prayers prayed, "May never a man go to hell, may all men be in God's kingdom, amen,"

    As men yell in the battlefield, "For Glory," "For God," and, "For the King and Kingdom", Ares is silently watching, wanting to let the carnage continue,  for it isn't God's domain, nor the Devil's domain, it is HIS domain, he does not care for widows of the fallen, kings wanting a end, he listens to the cries of the slaughtered in war, and laughs

  3. 7 hours ago, The Doodling Astronaut said:

    Second module down. Third one will launch today

    screenshot1375.pngscreenshot1390.png

    Bonus pic

    screenshot1366.png

    I was messing around w/ my SOHO replica, and I saw a comet from the corner of my screen, so will use KACET II, launch TBD (KACET I got retired in a blaze of glory).

  4. On 3/17/2021 at 8:27 PM, Cavscout74 said:

    The abort test used a 1.875m SRB to cheaply launch the pod for the test

    tPn99sWh.png?1

    WDjyUMhh.png?1

    I always do a pad abort test and a IFAT (in-flight abort test) using a srb like you did, or a stripped down LV, like with my Leo Crew Launcher's test, the 2nd stage engine was deactivated and the SM engines, removed and replaced with some ballast on the interstage.

  5. On 3/16/2021 at 2:38 PM, kerbiloid said:

    It's equipped with "hybrid docking adaptor", made of the hard-capture ring from APAS-95-derived IDSS and the soft=capture probe from Almaz-derived modules.

    Also, it doesn't have grapple fixtures for Canadarm, so it can't take it.
    But it may be equipped with grapple fixtures for Aist, used by ERA. But ERA can't attach to the Canadarm grapple fixtures to walk.

      Reveal hidden contents

    05.jpg


    So, unlikely it's compatible with IDA/PMA.

    No, having Nauka DOCK to PMA-1, and the Canadarm could plausibly have a little adapter a "Glove" if you will that can adapt it to the ERA/Aist Grapple fixture, and visa versa with ERA and Canadarm's LEE (latching end effector thor those who don;t know, it's the "hand" bit).

  6. On 3/15/2021 at 3:26 PM, SunlitZelkova said:

    Korabl-Sputnik 1 launch, which carried a mannequin and voice recordings of a human voice to test the radio.

    Wasn't the recording a Borscht recipe or something like that?

    On 3/15/2021 at 2:10 PM, mrfox said:

    That's pretty good, it can make a SSO too.

  7. 1 hour ago, kerbiloid said:

    If they still can undock... :cool:

      Reveal hidden contents

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTFgzXPLIUnvef83uOn4ry

     

    Cold welding, screws that up bigtime

     

    1 hour ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

    t would be a cruel irony if the US segment has to separate from the Russian segment because it’s irreparably broken, after the Russians threatening the opposite a few years back. :/

    Yeah, the first threat was probably caused by everyone's favourite debate starter GEOPOLITICS, this one may be because, you literally can't live in it anymore.
    Wait
    I have a stupid idea
    the ROS undocks (or at the least the deadly parts), but Nauka undocks first and repositions to PMA-1, like a wierd reverse Zarya-Unity berthing 

  8. 47 minutes ago, kerbiloid said:

    https://www.interfax.ru/russia/756235

    Cosmonauts now spend ~25% of worktime on housekeeping.

    Last expedition has spent  579 h 20 m, i.e. 25.3% of worktime, on the Russian segment servicing.

    The science took 28.6%.

    Previous ten expeditions spent on science from 15% to 36% of their worktime.

    Lately, the oxygen regeneration  system Ekectron-VM  was out of order 7 times. Also there were troubles with toilet and food heater.

    The ROS is kinda breakin on them, the thing is 30 something, at least parts of it in Zarya probably, space years for spaecraft is like dog years, lots of them in human years.

    1 hour ago, kerbiloid said:

    They need ice for hockey and snow for igloo, so the only  purpose of an orbital base is to have something to be attached to the Canadarm shoulder.

    Canadarm vs Lyappa, who's the better space arm/assembly device? 

  9. 10 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

    It's a  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-stabilisation

     

    Probably any looking like a cylinder covered with solar panels

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteosat
    (100 rpm)

      Reveal hidden contents

    image_gallery?uuid=da6d2bbd-cdb5-4f0c-91

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satélite_de_Coleta_de_Dados

      Reveal hidden contents

    image_gallery?uuid=fc63d8e2-a354-413d-a7

     

    And also

    https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/basics/chapter11-2/

    and
    https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/explorer_hessi.htm

      Reveal hidden contents

    hessi__smex-6__4.jpg


    and

    https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/4441/does-a-satellite-naturally-turn-in-phase-with-its-orbit-always-facing-earth

     

    They can be rotating just around the main axis pointed at nowhere, just to keep predictable position and plane, or additionally around the perpendicluar axis to keep its main rotation axis poiting at the Sun or the Earth.

    That's a lot of cylinders with panels

  10. 2 minutes ago, wumpus said:

    Why did they build there if they didn't intend to launch over China?  Or did Chinese relations improve between construction and first test launch?  Couldn't they get less inclination restrictions by building where they wouldn't have re-route rockets?

    It was build there so the US wouldn't find it but they did, this is from a U-2 Spy Plane . It was also there because, the Steppe is empty and they could just, make bigger stuff without killing people.
    Baikonur_CIA_U-2.gif

  11. 2 minutes ago, tater said:

    The entire Boca Chica facility is under 200 acres, and the launch site itself is maybe 25-30 acres of that. About 2/3 the size of my kids' school campus for the whole thing, and the size of my neighborhood (a street in a loop) for the launch area.

    As a reality check, the Boca Chica lauch area (I'm counting that entire end there, so I am exaggerating it substantially) is 0.007% of the land area of Biak. I would imagine there is grossly more "devastation" on Biak to this day just from WW2 (Japanese shipping was slaughtered in that region by the 5th AF, there are likely wrecks still leaking oil/etc to this day).

    I don't see SpaceX moving to an equatorial jungle any time soon, but I'm sure the article both generated clicks, and aroused moral outrage in some.

    It is The Guardian after all
    I'm not saying it's a tabloid
    But I'm not saying it isn't either

×
×
  • Create New...