Jump to content

Snorkel

New Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Snorkel

  1. Sure, considering the leap in technology. I think you missed that part. I'm not saying it's not beautiful. It is. But then again, so is my wallpaper. It's not playable either.
  2. Sure, but no-one could have even alpha tested this mess before early access release. If they did they would have instantly found a bunch of broken stuff. This is not fit for early access at a 50 USD price point. This is fit for internal alpha, at most. Did you see Matt Lowne actually flying the KSC in space? I've been part of the KSP 1 following since the Mun wasn't even there. Valued in player satisfaction (considering the leaps tech has taken since), this is worse.
  3. 15 FPS flying through the Space Center in my two engine jet. No water physics, no reentry physics, the same pause/unpause bug the youtubers at the ESA event discovered more than a week (two?) ago ... Random errors when in space, the action list thing is doing its own thing, I can't scroll up or down alongside my rockets to see what I'm trying to add to the bottom no matter what modifier I press. And then the whole click on the part then find it in a separate menu to control it thing. I hate it. Nope, this whole concept sucks, and even if i did like it this version is still way too alpha to call early access. I'll stick to KSP 1 for a year or so and check the sequel again then. But with this senseless GUI I doubt I'll ever return. Not until someone mods it anyway. And yeah, my rig is up to spec. If I somehow doubled my computer's performance with a i9 12700, a 4080ti and 128 GB memory (or whatever it would take), I'd still only make 30 FPS in my scrappy little jet.
×
×
  • Create New...