[Flags in saves cause Kerbals, wheels and landing gear to fall into the ground and not function properly on many bodies (terrain bug)]

i had problems with this particular wheels you are using in the image. If yuo use the bigger ones it works great. The small one are super bugged

[Orbital Survey [v0.9.4 for KSP2 v0.2.1]]

Thank you for this incredible content, i think it should be inside the game not as a mod but as a feature!!!

I noticed a incredible drop in framerate while scanning, at warp speed 100X or greater, don't know if you already know that.

Also i noticed that if you have multiple satellite performing the scanning, it is almost random the satellite that gets the science when you reach a certain milestone

[Campaign Won't Save if Campaign Name Ends with a Period]

On 12/30/2023 at 1:02 AM, The Space Peacock said:

does anyone running into this by chance have a campaign name that ends with a "." ? trying to figure out if this is related

 

I tried creating a new campaign today, and i can save now. The name of the previous campaign  contained a dot (.), so this is likely the cause of the problem.

[Campaign Won't Save if Campaign Name Ends with a Period]

It is very frustrating. The game is now in a playable and enjoyable state, yet I can't play it...

[Campaign Won't Save if Campaign Name Ends with a Period]

Reported Version: v0.2.0 (latest) | Mods: none | Can replicate without mods? Yes 
OS: windows 10 | CPU: amd 2700x | GPU: 2070 | RAM: 32 gb 2933 mhz corsair

 

I can't save. Every time I create a save, I try to load it, and the save doesn't exist. This happens for both manual saves and quick saves with F5. I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling, but the problem persists.

EDIT 01/01/2024

Apparently this bug happens due to the presenc of a dot "." in the campaign name!!

[Show and Tell - Procedural Radiators]

On 3/25/2022 at 5:34 PM, N9 Gaming said:

I think this practically guarentees procedural solar panels! And very likely procedural structural pieces as well. I can't help but think procedural fuel tanks are easily a possibility too 

I am also of the opinion that fuel tanks could benefit from being procedural components. This feature might focus solely on the fuel tank's length and fuel type, which would already be quite impressive. However, I also believe it would be advantageous for the procedural system to encompass the starting diameter (perhaps as a discrete choice rather than a continuous one) as well as the ending diameter.

[End game content?]

In my opinion, the primary issue concerning science in KSP1 is the limited size of the tech tree. After a certain stage, you accumulate a significant amount of science without a clear direction for its utilization. A valuable enhancement could involve implementing a small tech tree for individual parts, each offering enhancements to specific characteristics.  For example, consider an engine upgrade that requires a certain amount of science investment and provides benefits like a 2% increase in thrust or a reduction in weight, and so on.

[Massive drag bug with basically every inline auxiliary part (tests, results and pictures)]

Thank you for discovering all this. I too felt that drag is a little bit too high and now i know the reason. Hofully this bug can be easly fixed by the dev in the upcomings patches

[Week One Adventures]

Has anyone noticed a really high aerodynamic drag or it is just me? Is this change in the physics simulations wanted or a unespected result (aka bug)?