I personally only have 2 things to say.
As some other users pointed out they are working on systems way on the end of the roadmap (like multiplayer). And I just wanna know why, it's your last goal for a buggy and unfinished game which is going to change a lot in the next 2-5 years. Why already work on these systems when they are all likely to change. Why not first fix the game and bring big updates step by step, or at least not divert so much resources to these systems.
Secondly why so much QA, it's an early access game which is normally used by (small indie) teams to get funds and feedback from enthusiastic players. You have funds as you are backed by a REALLY big company. But then why still go into early access while not using it's full potential. With this I mean why go trough the intense and long process of good quality QA instead of decreasing the price of the game (cause to be fair I have never seen a EA game for 50 eu. And this game is probably not even worth as much as KSP 1 in this state) and letting us help with QA. This way we at least see a lot of progress and even help you a lot more.
So yes for now I will be sticking with KSP 1. I'm sorry
