Jump to content

UtterN

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by UtterN

  1. Note: I am somewhat a newb, even after playing Ksp for one and a half year (first time I landed on the Mün was a month after I started playing Ksp).

    I usually launch a central hub with the most neccesary equipment such as a habmodule, rtg's, batteries etc. Then I launch and attach power generation and longrangecoms.

    For the record, I believe I built this particular station in .18.

    You might notice that I've put the station in a very LKO and that's because I was experimenting with viewing distances, trying to see the VAB and comstation from space as I was falling by.

    4mCcnh.jpg

  2. Well, thank you for the first set of rovers, I thought they were perfect. The feeling when you got your rover to enter Dunas atmosphere and open the parachutes to make a successful landing were awesome.

    One thing I'd like to see on one of the rovers before you go back to the drawing board is some sort of connector at the back on the vehicle, so you can stack them "upwards".

  3. Well without mechjeb I would still be in kerbin atmosphere trying to get a good orbit. After playing around with mechjeb I learned how to build space worthy rockets and how to get a good orbit.

    And I would not say it takes away half the fun, it more likely adds some instead, It can be harder to use mechjeb than controlling manually if you build a bad rocket... I almost always use mechjeb these days.

    By the way, welcome to KSP! ^^

  4. Well, my relation to kerbal safety is very strange. Whenever a kerbal dies after having done something stunning such as landed on the mun (yes it's still a fantastic accomplishment for whenever I land successfully on the mun) I fell kind of sad that I could not save the kerbal. But when I'm testing new rocket designs I just go through kerbal life like if it was baking soda.

×
×
  • Create New...