profesorfrink42

On the other hand, humankind cares about the lives of astronauts. We don't care about our Kerbals. Or rather, we forget about their deaths 2 mins after the mission fails.

You don't have to put your sepratrons in the CoM of the empty tank if you use two of them at near-balanced places. What I highly suggest is putting your radial boosters just a bit below your "main" rocket, and using a sepraton placed highly over the CoM of the empty rocket. That way, it will naturally spin towards the center (where your main engine will be) but it won't touch the main engine. Still, I suggest using two pairs of sepratrons: a pair over the CoM and another below. Using pairs is obviously done to prevent spinning (which can lead to unexpected consequences)

It made the game more difficult in a sense that you couldn't make certain rockets or they would be too wibbly-wobbly, so you had to go for other designs. Some rockets would basically make the physics engine cry and destroy itself

Not at all, I'm using a (hopefully tested ) "stock" B9 spaceplane. Anyway, I fix it! I went back through the pages and found a "fix" for the ExsurgentEngineering plugin. I thought I intalled that fix, but turns out I didn't. It works perfectly fine now

This mod blows my mind. The possibilities are endless. However, I'm having some serious problems getting some parts to work, specifically, the Sabre M engine. It takes fuel from resources, but doesn't produce any actual thrust, even though if I right click on it it shows that it has a set amount of thrust. There's no flame effect either. Also, the engine with reverse thrusters don't work in reverse mode I'm 90% sure that it's my fault, because I have too many mods

Ok, I think I managed how to do it. There are still some problems when attaching an object in front of the cockpit (the nosecone, for example) but it still works. Basically, you got the the .cfg file on the pod you LIKE, and put the name of what appears in the "Internals" section in the .cfg file of the part you want to CHANGE.

Hi. I basically want to replace the MK2 Cockpit interior view with the MK1, since it's much more suiting for airplanes. I guess I should be looking in the /Internals/Spaces folder, but I've got no clue where to begin with. Thanks.

[/noparse]. That spoiler would look like this: Image URL Here Again, very good tutorial and a nice mission description. Tags added! As I said, I'd love to add some solar panels and batteries, but I don't remember the exact mod for that! I have to check the kerbal.net As for realism, I could've tried ZOxygene, but for some reason it crashes my game after a while (If I can get to orbit). Good luck!

[/noparse]. That spoiler would look like this: Image URL Here Again, very good tutorial and a nice mission description. I didn't know that tag existed! I'm editing the post right now

Hi there kerbonauts! I wanted to make this mission back in 0.16, but then 0.17 came out and the modpacks weren't properly working. Finally, mods are working fine and I can make this mission. I'd like this thread to be both a description of my mission and a tutorial, if you don't mind. Mods used: MechJeb(http://www.kerbal.net/mod.php?id=20) NovaPunch(http://www.kerbal.net/mod.php?id=31) RemoteTech(http://www.kerbal.net/mod.php?id=45) ReEntry Heat*(http://www.kerbal.net/mod.php?id=34) Optional: ZOxygene if you want to make it more realistic *Although I used the ReEntry Heat plugin and the aeroshell heatshield, I didn't notice any reentry difference. It was my first time with this mod, I will give it another try. Not needed: *craft http://www./?f9gcb2yilxlb68d I love my design, but it has a huge bug: Even though I put an RCS tank on the stage 2, it didn't use it. It used only the "orbital" RCS tank. If anybody knows how to correct this, please let me know. Also, you are free to try your own design. Also, check stages. The sepatrons weren't working Basics of satellite networks: The remotetech plugin allows you to make unmanned probes and control them, with the addition of a delay between communications because of the speed of light. If you try to launch an unmanned vehicle, as soon as you lose radio contact you won't be able to control it. Radio contact will stop once you don't have visual contact with KSC. (Thanks to MS Paint) Unless you set up satellites. But then again, you wouldn't be able to control it in every place. For our network we will use satellites in a 0º (or 270º) inclination circular orbit. Now you have to choose between two parameters: Orbit altitude or number of satellites. Of course, altitude should be higher than 70km unless you want to lose your satellites due to atmospheric drag If you choose number of satellites, you want to know the altitude, right? Well, this can be done by (almost) only drawing. You have to draw an n-gon (n=number of satellites) such as the sides are tangent* to a circle, which will be Kerbin. *Actually, you absolutely don't want to go with the perfect precision of a tangent line. You want to add some more distance. This will ensure that at least one of your satellites has visual contact with KSC. Oh, you want your n-gon to be regular As I said, you don't really want it to be tangent, mainly because you won't be able to set such precision when orbiting and maneuvering. So I decided to make a network consisting of 6 satellites. That leaves me with an hexagon. Note: I didn't do the actual calculations for orbit altitude. I did it by intuition, my satellite altitude will be 247km as you will see. I think at this altitude I could have done it with 5 satellites, but I'm not sure. Ok, after this (innecessary?) wall-o-text, here come some pics: 2+1 stages, where the +1 means orbital maneuvering stage. Ascent autopilot is set to 247 km. , there's fuel left in the stage I but I don't want to put that many debris, so I decouple *As I said, sepatrons didn't work, I didn't put them in the correct stage it's time to decouple those fairings Ok, so we are at a 247 km circular orbit. Time to return to kerbalSCIENCE. We will now decouple our first satellite. Since the decoupling applies a force to the satellite, it won't be in a perfect orbit, that's why I recommend using the lowest ejection strength decoupler possible. You can modify the part.cfg of a decoupler and set it to a force of 0. As I said, time for science. This is really basic science, but it's always worth remembering That's one of Kepler's laws. Basically, it tells you that the period of the orbit will increase with the radius of said orbit, that's what we want to know right now. We are at almost the same place as our satellite, but we want to make an n-gon. That means we have to set the next satellite in a different place. Since we are travelling at the same speed as the satellite, we need to go to either: -A higher orbit, and thus we will travel slower -A lower orbit, we will travel faster. Since we will put n satellites, there's a lot of orbit changes, thus, lots of delta-V spent. If I'm right, switching to a higher orbit (and coming back again to a 247km orbit) spends less delta-V, but I'm not sure. , more precisely, a 175km Lowering periapsis to 175km (yes, there's some other satellites in orbit, I didn't take screnshots of every moment ) While it's not absolutely neccessary to circularise this orbit, it's highly recommended, as it will make this mission easier. So, we are now on a 175km orbit. Now we will time warp until we are almost at the next vertex of our n-gon*. We will now raise our apoapsis to 247 km. Latter we'll circularise that orbit and set another satellite. Rinse and repeat until you have your 6 satellites online. *If you want to calculate it precisely, you can use Kepler's Law to calculate the time it will take you to reach to your apoapsis in your 175x247km orbit (well, that's in my case of course). Note that you will complete only half orbit. I'm doing this the kerbal way: map viewing, not calculations. Some more pics: Now, time for deorbit and reentry. MechJeb didn't calculate accurately the fuel left, so I landed in the KSC sea. So that's it! It's not a perfect hexagon, but it will work Oh, one last thing I wanted to say. I had a mod in 0.16 for a deployable satellite, it would deploy from a square attached to the side. I'd love to put it in my satellites, but I didn't find it

Wow, thanks. I must recognize I didn\'t check the how to forum

Hi there. I\'m new to the full version of KSP, I played with the demo for about a month. Now I find that the quantity of add-ons is overwhelming. Wouldn\'t it be a great idea to keep tracked what add-ons you have installed? Since I\'m an avid PC gamer, I know this isn\'t a new idea at all. In fact, I want to share with you what could be the starting project for this mod installing program. It\'s designed for another game: http://fallout3.nexusmods.com/mods/640/ (Fallout Mod Manager) Unfortunately, I don\'t have any idea of programming or modifying that program, but I hope somebody finds this info useful.