Goran

BridgeBuilder ...on second thought - anything on http://www.crypticsea.com/

Do we cheer for it to go well or go spectacularly caboom? I still don\'t fully understand rovers landing sequence - but it makes for a compelling argument to adding animated parts to KSP

I don\'t think building a car is the primary goal there. Also it comes with rockets preassembled. You just stick them on and go. Also I didn\'t notice any other form of propulsion in the video. All in all - very Kerbal

There\'s something vaguely Kerbal about this upcoming game: http://www.crashtastic.com/ Needs moar boosters and explosions but certainly shows potential!

Outstanding

Tried that twice. I guess my orbit was a little off and the satellite never showed up for our date . I think I might just wait for squad team to make it a tad easier for me.

Wouldn\'t this be a subset of Satellite observation (http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=3941.0) ?

Mission successful. Managed to launch quite a large ship and put lander + satellite in low orbit (4.000m - Ap/Pg 100m apart). Separated from satellite and made a sucessful landing. Waited 35mins for satellite to come back into view. The idea behind this is to see how hard would it be to pull off a randevous with the satellite in moon orbit. Without help from the game it\'s virtually impossible. By the time the satellite comes back into view it\'s too late to re-launch. Chances of getting anywhere near it flying blindly are quite slim. I think docking will require some careful thinking on devs part to make it challenging yet fun (as they\'ve managed to do with lunar landings). I\'m looking forward to what they do Oh, and if anyone manages to randevous with satellite in moon orbit after landing - you win an internet.

I knew someone would manage to land on the tower Good job!

Congratulations Ronox! @SmiteZero http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=2251.0

This was already done on Kerbal but since the new atmosphere model this isn\'t possible anymore. But now we have the Mun! 1. Put a satellite in low orbit around Mun 2. Decorate the satellite with signal flares for bonus points 3. Land on the moon 4. Take a picture of your satellite passing overhead

Step 1. Make sure you\'re using surface and not orbit mode on your navbal (should be switching automagically in x3). Step 2. Make your descent steeper. This uses more fuel but gives you more time to correct things. Step 3. Reduce your horizontal speed and vertical speed at the same time. I usually manage to park the lander at 5k+ altitude. Step 4. Point upwards and switch to RCS. With proper lander you can use translation control to keep your lander descending with no horizontal speed. Keep vertical speed under 50m/s. Step 4.5. Keep your vertical speed under 10m/s when under 300m . Step 5. Your lander is probably light enough so you can use RCS to land on the moon. Switch off your main engine and use RCS! Step 6. Don\'t run out of RCS fuel

Landed! Can\'t get home... Don\'t care! Kermans survived and are touching the moon... My life is complete... Can we have more planets now? EDIT: I was wrong - Kermans got home

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-china-nation-space-docking.html Will Harvester let Kerbal be left behind like this? Kerbal-China space race is on!

I like horizontal takeoff... And landing...

I wouldn't keep it - but it I might attempt to put it back into orbit

As reported at http://www.space.com/12999-dead-nasa-satellite-falling-earth-sept-23.html So It's not just my sattelites going defunct and crashing down - good to know!

Pre-ordered! My 5yo loves this game