metacognate

"Employees not get paid" and "Parent company sees marginally reduced profits" are two very different things, my friend. I think TakeTwo would be just fine if they did right by consumers. Increased profit for them does not, in fact, mean increased wages for programmers...that should be the case, but it's not.

TaleWorlds Entertainment did the same thing with Mount&Blade. They promised all future content for early adopters...and then were acquired by a new publisher who scrapped that promise, added one word to the name of the game - the SAME game - and started charging for all new content again. Sad to see the same thing happen to KSP. It's like selling someone unlimited sandwiches for life, and then a few years later saying "No, we don't make sandwiches anymore, we only make hoagies" just to get out of it. At the very least it should be steeply discounted for the people who made all prior development possible.

Really? I paid for Kerbal Space Program with the promise that all future content would be included. But it looks like, if I want to access the future content you are creating, I will have to pay for the game again. This is pretty dishonest behavior from a publisher. And it's not in line with your original vision for the game. Early adopters of KSP should be given the content you are developing. Not cool to just slap a "2" on your new expansions and pretend it's something different for money.

To all Mac users with non-functional maps: The developer of this plugin is just one person. There is no team. Go easy on 'im

Great, great ship. Easy to fly, powerful, and a lot better than everything else I've been using. Good for crash landings, too