Jump to content

Nalin_Airheart

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Kerbal Enthusiast
  1. Hour 0: Lock the doors. Hour 24: Succumb to the neuro-toxin and become a zombie. Hour 24: Kill someone and convert them. Hour 25: Party everyday.
  2. Excellent, the expansion has started, by the time .23 comes around KSP should be known to the entire Steam userbase and quite a lot of YouTube. (The main page of the forums tracks stats at the bottom, good job getting to that many posts.)
  3. I F9'd when I should've F5'd, its like that saying that If you french fry when you're supposed to pizza you're gonna have a bad time.
  4. Trying to make one of those fancy artificial gravity rings eh? I honestly don't know how to help but bigger docking ports = better connections. And avoid the octagonal strut because it will transform into a kraken and murder anything it touches. Also thats a ton of segments, why not just send a complete ring into space?
  5. This is possible in the stock game, albeit those ships are gonna be insanely weak and made with docking ports. Don't think Squad is gonna put these in the game ever, it's definitely in a mod already though.
  6. Granted, but they are written in blood leading to some deaths. I wish YouTube would stop changing it's layout.
  7. This is basically the "go-up-as-fast-as-possible" challenge whose name has slipped my mind. Nevertheless I'm trying with my scrub demo skills.
  8. Alright, here I go, don't glare at me but here's my plans for a budget gaming rig. Mobo: ASRock 760GM-GS3 AM3 Micro ATX Case: DIY-5823BK Black SECC ATX Mid Tower CPU: AMD Athlon X4 640 3.0GHz w/fan GPU: AMD Radeon 6670 RAM: Silicon Power 4GB DDR3 1333mhz PC3-10600 PSU: hec 585W ATX12V + Cord HDD: Seagate Barracuda 1TB WLAN Card: Baaqii WA009 USB WiFi ROM: ASUS 24X DVD Burner *I have all peripherals obviously or I wouldn't be typing this out. The total comes out to $361.28, and based on Performance Check the combined rig has scores as follows; CPU: 3374 GPU: 1047 HDD: 1087 RAM: 57ns Latency 3.4gb/s Uncached Transfer 1.2gb/s Write Transfer. Come at me rig builders. EDIT: On a side-note what I'm planning to build is gonna surpass my current system in many many ways. I use an HP G60-237US for most of my stuff and it's a really finnicky laptop, the heat gets to it, the wireless card is doing all sorts of crap, and the PSU actually failed on me a minute ago. It runs an AMD Turion X2 RM-72, GeForce 8200M G int. card, and has 3gigs of DDR2 to support Windows 7 x86. In comparison the Performance Check stats are: CPU: 1017 GPU: 57 (Save me please Radeon) HDD: 337 RAM is just some generic 2GBx1 PC2-5300, 1GBx1 PC2-6400
  9. The Xenosaga series and FFX have just stuck with me all these years, Xenosaga has some great blobby CGI set in a sci-fi universe with corruption and salt-aliens. FFX is just a pure fantasy RPG which I love and adore for all of it's accomplishments.
  10. IIRC there was another teacher on the forums asking around for help on mission/reward creation and balancing. There was an entire page and student forum too, I'll try to nail the thread onto a link for you if you want to talk to him.
  11. Please don't necro threads, this creates false hope :c and moves other threads down.

  12. "The rocket may not use the two atmo engines." I'll spell it out for you, the turbojets and normal jets aren't allowed on the passenger module because it's supposed to be replicating the Virgin Galactic craft. (AND ITS SPACE, WHY WOULD YOU USE THEM IN SPACE) There's no hard limit to airplane engines on the actual airplane, read the OP first please.
  13. *scoffs as he remembers previous attempts at staging gone wrong* On a more serious note this is literally just putting a payload into space with the engines on top. >Doesn't see the challenge in it besides not putting engines on the bottom.
  14. "KSP 2" They'll never do this, KSP being in constant development similar to TF2 with new changes being put out as fast as they can be programmed and tested means that KSP should never even need a sequel. This isn't a bad thing either for the people who bought KSP early on :3
  15. Did it once in the .13.3 demo by sheer anti-lag and luck. (Also unbalanced parts ) I still have yet to return without screwing up lander design in .18.3 (demo). If I fail, pics. If I succeed, pics.
×
×
  • Create New...