Keyes

This isn't the first time the Fortress Craft devs make comments on other companys and games. I like the way though they refrain from using the game Minecraft. One of the devs said a while back "Nobody will pay for Minecraft when they can pay $3.00 for Total Miner or FortressCraft." Looking at fortresscraft to be honest looks like one of those various minecraft android clones, androidcraft, mobilecraft, survivalcraft, etc. These devs whether it be a joke or not, well with Mojang it wasn't a joke, must be the first flaming Flame War games dev company.

So, On Steam, I saw that the lousy game fortresscraft had infected it's way on to steam, and I looked at the reviews, and the first one was this: By a Fortresscraft Dev himself, 487 hours on record. Well, it's the most amazing game ever. Better graphics than Dwarf Fortress. Cheaper than Call of Duty. More blocks than Kerbal Space Program. Better lighting than Zelda on the NES. As you can see. It's clearly the best game ever. Then, another dev comes along as says Cheaper than Call of Duty? I don't know, those guys are pretty darn cheap! If we're cheaper than that, than what does that make us? I never liked the fortresscraft devs. What do you think of this? Sarcastic or not, Mocking Zelda was just going over the top.

I think models is the word I'm looking for, But anyway so I've been playing KSP for quite a while now. I think some things I'd like are better IVA, More Planets and a procedurally generated Universe so everyone has the same universe to be discovered, but that's not I'm going to talk about as those have been discussed. Another in progress game by the name of BeamNG Drive caught my eye, and I thought it could or may not be a cool feature in KSP. Basically, in Beam NG Drive it has a very realistic soft body physics engine that allows for damage on cars. If you look at a few videos of it you can see its not just normal crashing. Now I thought if it could happen in KSP, but not so extreme as all our landers would be getting smooshed to pieces and what not. I'm talking about if you crash into your space station, or into the space centre or into an asteroid you saw some bits of destruction to your vehicle rather than the generic explosion. I guess the next part to this is where the better IVA would come in where your kerbals have to rebuild and repair, assuming they sufficient resources. Now, this may be a feature not everyone would like so maybe have different modes like Easy - Realistic or something like it. I would like to hear what you people think, All the best, Richard.