Jump to content

Awesomegamegeek12

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Does this mean that Laythe could be a potentially BETTER home than Kerbin for the kerbals?! You know with Laythe being mostly sand and close to optimum tempreture and the same atmosphere makeup and a similar pressure?! (Nerds out.)
  2. I really do think the only logical explanation, unless the devs have plans to add animals, that the kerbals are plants unless there were a lot of underground dwelling proto-kerbals or a different evolutionary chain of animals underneath (Which when I think about it would regulate the Eco-system and greenhouses gases ect.) the surface which the kerbals evolved from. Just to add, these are the reasons I think kerbals are plants for now. Not a bias 'It's green... PLANT!" kinda thing. And although the devs have said they're not plants... ehh...science... I don't want to sound ignorant for trusting something other than the main source of the game though, them being the people that made it and all... I just... science..
  3. We've settled with the conclusion of kerbals are plants of some form, though not weather they normally photosynthesize or do something different, or what they're made of.
  4. Maybe all kerbals are just giant space nerds? Probably not. The most likely thing is that the rest are at KSC 2. Maybe it's like a backup launch pad / Ground control? Maybe they built the ground control then learnt that it's much easier to launch from the equator?
  5. The're was alooot of CO2 in the atmosphere then, all the plants producing O2 changed that makeing the perfect conditions for animal cells to evolve and a balanced eco-system was formed.
  6. 'Not even vegans have a problem with brutally killing plants!' The plant part is debatable, but oh well.
  7. Wouldn't the lack of animals make existence on kerbin as a plant difficult? Low CO2 levels... maybe Kerbin's oceans have traces or carbon in them and kerbals developed such a method of transportation so they could bathe in the oceans of Kerbin? Questions keep presenting themselves.
  8. That lander looks really nice, I also like that lifter, good job and that flag is just magical.
  9. I couldn't dig up much on the kerbal's evolutionary chain... back to square 1 I guess.
  10. I don't think that's feasible seeing as they're approximately 1 meter tall and 25 KG.
  11. Though this has some support in the plant theory, looks as though kerbals evolved from plants, I'll look into this more, of course.
×
×
  • Create New...