Quilbo
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Quilbo
-
-
i7 860 with 4gb RAM and 64 system
I just tried the delta physics settings and performance went better. SLIGHTLY better.
I'll just wait the 64bit update.. thanks: )
-
Gonna try with lowest textures available, fact is my pc runs smoothly stuff as Battlefield 3, but just can't run Kerbal
I can't even launch a 200 parts rocket
Actually, with ZERO graphic settings, it even stutters in main menu, after clicking "start game" it moves the camera to the right, and it lags and sutters..
I know the game isn't optimized and so on, but as i play it it's unconceivable to even think building large stuff..
-
I hope they'll make regrouping available.. it's a pain as it is
thx
-
Seriously, how the hell did you build something that big?
And i don't mean because of it's projectual difficulty, but because the game is barely playable with 200 items on screen, that **** must be like 10 times mine
And my pc runs Battlefield 3 smoothly (i know Kerbal isn't optimized.. so WHY you and others are able to build stuff like that? are you masochists playing with 5 fps?
-
You really need to allow clients to weld what they want.
This is awesome
-
Do NOT go on any tube site, don't watch any video, and play this awesome game using the support of your brain and use it to figure out what to do
I'd say, too, one thing not to do first in this game is killing the boss, or, going orbiting the last planet of your system, or scoring a backflip goal
Really, "what to do?"
-
I am building some escape pods for my space station, and it just adds, in the staging section, in VAB, 20000000000 numbers, so i can no more see all the stages because every single thruster of every escape pod i did has an indipendent staging icon for everything: parachute, separator, thrusters
there are just too many icons, is there a way to group them? as it is now it's just crazy and unpractical
ty:confused:
What makes a fast KSP computer?
in The Lounge
Posted
Well **** me, really?
Didn't they say this game needed more CPU than GPU? Actually, my GTX 470 doesn't even work that hard (monitoring it with Afterburner), same for the cpu core the game uses, yet i can't fly anything bigger than 200 parts, with MINIMUM graphic settings.
What up here?
Why i run this game so badly? (while running, let's say, Battlefield 3 smoothly with high-medium details..? )