Jump to content

Quilbo

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quilbo

  1. I had i7's default GPU (HD4000 or something like that) and it was bad bottleneck. When I bought Nvidia's GeForce GTX 660 graphics card my game experience became very much better. Now i can use 2560x1440 resolution and highest levels of texture settings and fly over 1000 part's ships to orbit.

    Well **** me, really?

    Didn't they say this game needed more CPU than GPU? Actually, my GTX 470 doesn't even work that hard (monitoring it with Afterburner), same for the cpu core the game uses, yet i can't fly anything bigger than 200 parts, with MINIMUM graphic settings.

    What up here?

    Why i run this game so badly? (while running, let's say, Battlefield 3 smoothly with high-medium details..? )

  2. Gonna try with lowest textures available, fact is my pc runs smoothly stuff as Battlefield 3, but just can't run Kerbal :P

    I can't even launch a 200 parts rocket :(

    Actually, with ZERO graphic settings, it even stutters in main menu, after clicking "start game" it moves the camera to the right, and it lags and sutters.. :(

    I know the game isn't optimized and so on, but as i play it it's unconceivable to even think building large stuff..

  3. I am building some escape pods for my space station, and it just adds, in the staging section, in VAB, 20000000000 numbers, so i can no more see all the stages because every single thruster of every escape pod i did has an indipendent staging icon for everything: parachute, separator, thrusters

    there are just too many icons, is there a way to group them? as it is now it's just crazy and unpractical

    ty:confused:

×
×
  • Create New...