Jump to content

Cosmos3110

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cosmos3110

  1. Atlas V is by Lockheed Martin and Boeing which make up the United Launch Alliance. :)

    Also, I just found this from the LA Times.

    So yeah, Boeing is receiving around 1.6 times more money than SpaceX for the contract.

    SpaceX asked for that much, Boeing also asked for that much. All that shows is how SpaceX is saying that they can do a better job (reusable and all) for less than Boeing. It may not seem like it, but that is sort of a slap in the face to Boeing, seeing that they need 1.6x the money to do the same job.

  2. I read something somewhere that after they lost a Proton due to improper installation of several gyroscopes they finally had enough and installed cameras to watch the construction of the rockets a lot more closely. They really had some awful times with shoddy workmanship in that program.

    I hope that this isn't a recurrence of the same issue, they really need Proton to be performing well in order to not lose contracts to the west.

    However, on the inside, I hope Rogozin feels like an idiot. :sticktongue:

    No, as far anyone can tell so far, it appears to be a faulty vernier rocket in the third stage, which caused the rocket to loose control. Maybe Russia could start sending their satellites into orbit with trampolines?

  3. The rocket itself is a pretty reliable rocket. Most failures are problems with the different attachable upper stages, like the Briz- M. Im no engineer, but with all the failures with the Proton recently I think that Roscosmos needs to take more time after this failure, and pound out as many problems as they can, but like I said, Im no engineer and there could be other factors involved that would make scrubbing all the launches for the next year pointless.

×
×
  • Create New...