Jump to content

S3416130

Members
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

26 Excellent

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketry Enthusiast
  1. I am very sorry for my absence from this thread. I've had quite a few real life issues lately, it's a long story. However, this project is not dead. Previously, the capsule nose had been modeled as a docking port of sorts, even though it would never be one. This made the capsule unnecessarily tall once a docking port was added in KSP. Now, I'm investigating an alternate nose which is much more integrated (for lack of a better word) with the capsule. Once a custom docking port, which I still plan on making, is added, the combined ship will be much more like the original. Stock docking ports can also be used. What do you think? Criticisms and suggestions are highly welcome. Changing the nose also meant I could fix a few issues with the previous model and now the front windows are slightly larger, allowing more visibility. If the windows are too large, I can easily make them smaller. The previous model made window modifications much harder. Interesting, I guess I've never really seen my project as in production, but always as a work in progress design. I can never visualise an end product, but rather a general shape, and it tends to develop from there. This also means I could potentially never be completely happy with a design, always changing it and missing deadlines for its completion, since I don't have a final design I'm aiming for. Apologies again for the delays and absences, I will try my hardest to release this soon.
  2. The original plan was to make my own unique props but the ALCOR ones are really good. It will be difficult to come close to them in terms of quality. Failing that, I'll look into including them if the ALCOR license permits.
  3. I haven't posted an update in a while, since I haven't been able to do a lot of work on this project lately. Here's what it looks like so far. RPM integration is beginning to take shape (click on the numbers for annotations). I scrapped a lot of my old IVA work, but I think it looks better now than before. edit. You can also change the viewer mode to 1st person and use WASD to move around the internal.
  4. Looking back, I can't help but think "what the hell was I thinking?". It's an interesting progression though. Sorry, no download yet. I'm still in the process of making an IVA, and I still need to figure out the best way of giving people access to the parts when I release them. I'm thinking Google Drive maybe.
  5. I've still got a few more weeks left of this semester to go. Apologies for not being able to finish that texture Deathsoul097, like I promised.
  6. Here's a quick mock-up I've made in my spare time. Most of the textures are shared between parts for now. Also, I'm scrapping the current shroud and LES for a much better design. More on that later.
  7. Apologies for the delay, real life is keeping me busy. Specifically, University requires most of my attention for the next couple of months or so, though I still browse the forums every so often. Here's where I left off a couple of months ago, but I'm not sure I like it, nor do I know how to fix it. Suggestions are appreciated, but I probably won't have time to act on them for a while.
  8. Okay, the solar panels (minus texture) will now deploy, retract and track the sun, though they do seem very flimsy. I also just realised a crucial error that affects several part models that I've made so far.
  9. Sorry, there's no alpha for the time being, but maybe in the next week or so. As for the monitors, for now they're solely aesthetic, but it would be a very interesting direction to go with the RasterPropMonitor plugin. However, there are no plans for that at the moment.
  10. Sorry, I can get carried away with modelling sometimes.
  11. Especially considering eight of those pipes are jettisoned along with the fairings and won't even be seen very often. It would be no great loss if I removed them. I just checked, all pipes have 24 sides each (the default setting).
  12. So I've mostly modelled another part, this one a first stage engine. Sadly, this new engine has a mesh triscount of over 20,000, though I know of a few areas where large savings can be made. Also, the physics mesh will be significantly simpler.
  13. My experience with FAR in KSP is minimal so far, so I'll have to test the capsule and escape system for a more stable design. Thanks for the suggestion, I never would have noticed this was a problem otherwise.
  14. I'll see what I can do. The capsule still needs a few tweaks before even a partial release, but I can always update it further in subsequent releases.
×
×
  • Create New...