Jump to content

Density of gases in space for in-space collection and refueling of spacecraft


PB666

Recommended Posts

Density of gases in space

The solar wind is a stream of plasma released from the upper atmosphere of the Sun. It consists of mostly electrons and protons with energies usually between 1.5 and 10 keV.- wp

The sun loses about 109 kg/s. This loss occurs unevenly over the this gas radiates outward (below)

[TABLE=width: 500]

[TR]

[TD=align: center]___Planet____[/TD]

[TD=align: right]Sun Distance (~r; m)[/TD]

[TD=align: right]4pi*r2 (m2)[/TD]

[TD=align: right]kg / m2s[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Mercury[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0.58 x 1011[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0.42 x 1023[/TD]

[TD=align: right]2.3 x 10-14[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Venus[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1.08 x 1011[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1.46 x 1023[/TD]

[TD=align: right]6.8 x 10-15[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Earth[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1.50 x 1011[/TD]

[TD=align: right]2.82 x 1023[/TD]

[TD=align: right]3.5 x 10-15[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Mars[/TD]

[TD=align: right]2.28 x 1011[/TD]

[TD=align: right]6.53 x 1023[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1.5 x 10-15[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

The final column shows the mass of gas that passes any point at a given equitorial radius from the sun.

There are discussions which involve the in-space refueling based on gas scavenging from space. The problem as we see above is that you would have to find a means of evacuating large volumes of space, but in actuality one could not evacuate space in the same way one might evacuate a chamber. In a chamber the molecules do not travel far before they strike another particle, and this constant richochet of particles push the gas from highest pressure to lowest pressure. In space particles travel a large distance before the strike another particle.

But around the sun the particles move a way as a consequence of ionization, high-frequency excitation, and strong magnetic fields impart on that plasma a tremedous amount of kinetic energy. The wind travels between 0.3 - 0.8 Mm/s. Using a value of 0.4 Mm/Second.

The plasma density is basically 1kg spread out over 400 sun-centered radial kilometer of square areas specified (1 / '4th column') and so basically the density is much lower or or spread around around 1020 m3 or 5 times the volume of the moon. Therefore non-directional evacuation will not work.

The next table shows how much hydrogen one could ideally extract from a collector of 1 sq meter, point in the incoming direction of the solar wind in one calender year (31557600s)

collected (kg/yr). It assumes that every bit of wind that crosses a section of a spherical surface at the given radius (specified by the planets orbital radius) will be collected.

[TABLE=width: 500]

[TR]

[TD]Ship near orbit[/TD]

[TD]Collection rate (kg / m2yr)[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Mercury[/TD]

[TD]0.00000072[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Venus[/TD]

[TD]0.00000021[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Earth[/TD]

[TD]0.00000011[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]Mars[/TD]

[TD]0.00000005[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

So lets say one need 1000 kg of hydrogen for a rocket being returned from mars to earth, the mission will be for 2 years after which it needs the fuel to return. How large should the collection plate of the collector be?

So for any given meter of collector at Mars radius collects 0.0000001 kg/2yr and since you need 1000 kg, this translates to a collector of surface area 1010. Lets argue that the collector in its simplest form is 0.1mm of D=1 plastic. Then 1 cubic meter of 0.1mm can cover 10000 m2, thus for 1010 square meters would be require 106 m3, the weight of 109 kg plastic. The amount of material to create the collector far exceeds any benefit one would get from collecting the gas. In fact if we assume it take 49 units of fuel to get 1 unit of plastic to mars, then we would argue that break even point for the Mars for an in space hydrogen collector would take 1 billion years. However, on the bright side at about the same time, and expansion phase sun will bring the hydrogen to mars.

There are other proposed methods. Use EMF to coerce protons to a central site thereby increasing density. The problem however if one does the calculations it requires a massive amount of amperage at extremely high voltages to cover the size of area that would collect 1kg of protons traveling 400,000 m/s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...