Jump to content

Puff (the MAGIC dragon lives up to its name)


Korizan

Recommended Posts

So I was playing around with a tug to get a station to Mun from a Kerban orbit.

Tried multiple different engines with the "Terrier" coming out in the lead

Well until I started looking at the Mono-propellent engines then things got REALLY interesting.

So the baseline tug was putting out a Delta-V of 180 m/s Terrier before I added some tanks.

For fun I added in (4) O-10 "Puff" Engines and the Delta-V jumped to 836 m/s.

So I added on (4) Stratus-V Tanks and now I have 1,077 m/s and now on paper I can push the station to Mun and put it into orbit.

And now I have to ask, really, what am I missing here ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, you have way too much monoprop on that tug.

Unless of course you're just going to go with the monoprop engine design, in which case, lose the LOX.

A valid point

So I took 3.8t worth of Mono and 4 Puffs came up to 3,920 Delta-V

And 3.8 t worth of normal fuel with a Terrier and that came up with 4,946 Delta-V

Now just with that the Terrier wins based on Delta-V

However when you start looking at the size of the craft well not even remotely close.

Might have to look into this a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A valid point

So I took 3.8t worth of Mono and 4 Puffs came up to 3,920 Delta-V

And 3.8 t worth of normal fuel with a Terrier and that came up with 4,946 Delta-V

Now just with that the Terrier wins based on Delta-V

However when you start looking at the size of the craft well not even remotely close.

Might have to look into this a bit more.

The monoprop tanks have horrible mass efficiency and the O-10 has average-to-poor Isp. This means that the right chemical rocket will almost always yield a lighter overall stage.

The exception is where the thrust and DV requirement is super low. In this case, you can't find a chemical rocket and tank combo small enough to do the job efficiently.

An example from .90:

TyloLander1_zpse6f985f2.jpg

Chemical Tylo descent stage vs. monoprop.

Best,

-Slashy

*edit* remember that missions are not planned around which engine can give you the most DV, but rather which engine gives you the needed DV in the smallest and cheapest total package.

Edited by GoSlash27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...